Literature DB >> 8176065

The pitch of electrically presented sinusoids.

M F Dorman1, M Smith, L Smith, J L Parkin.   

Abstract

A patient who uses the Ineraid cochlear implant, and who has hearing thresholds less than 50 dB HL for frequencies under 500 Hz in his nonimplanted ear, was asked to match the pitch of low-frequency signals presented to his two ears. The patient produced pitch matches, for frequencies of 125, 200, and 300 Hz presented to his most apical electrode, that were slightly higher than the reference frequency. When signals of fixed frequency were presented to electrodes located in successively more basal cochlear locations, pitch increased in an orderly fashion--an average of 57 Hz (range = 31-87 Hz) for each change in electrode location.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8176065     DOI: 10.1121/1.408558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Improving melody recognition in cochlear implant recipients through individualized frequency map fitting.

Authors:  Walter Di Nardo; Alessandro Scorpecci; Sara Giannantonio; Francesca Cianfrone; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Preliminary results of the relationship between the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response and interaural pitch comparisons in bilateral cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Shuman He; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Effects of lower frequency-to-electrode allocations on speech and pitch perception with the hybrid short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Ann E Perreau; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  The Sound Quality of Cochlear Implants: Studies With Single-sided Deaf Patients.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Sarah Cook Natale; Austin M Butts; Daniel M Zeitler; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.

Authors:  Colette Boëx; Lionel Baud; Grégoire Cosendai; Alain Sigrist; Maria-Izabel Kós; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-02-01

7.  [Discrimination of musical pitch with cochlear implants].

Authors:  S Haumann; R Mühler; M Ziese; H von Specht
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Effects of extreme tonotopic mismatches between bilateral cochlear implants on electric pitch perception: a case study.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Mary W Lowder; Sue A Karsten; Christopher W Turner; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Changes in pitch with a cochlear implant over time.

Authors:  Lina A J Reiss; Christopher W Turner; Sheryl R Erenberg; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-03-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.