Literature DB >> 8166781

Supportive nurse-midwife care is associated with a reduced incidence of cesarean section.

J Butler1, B Abrams, J Parker, J M Roberts, R K Laros.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine whether care by a certified nurse-midwife, including personal labor support, was associated with a reduced risk of cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study comparing 3551 physician-managed patients with 1056 certified nurse-midwife-managed patients in a university hospital with a mixed socioeconomic and ethnic population was performed. Regression analysis was used to estimate the risk of labor abnormalities, diagnosis of fetal distress, and cesarean delivery in patients delivered by a certified nurse-midwife vs a physician and to control for maternal age, race, parity, fetal size, and delivery year. Subjects included were women having at least five prenatal visits who were delivered of term, singleton, liveborn infants without congenital anomalies with occiput presentation.
RESULTS: Odds ratio for cesarean section for women delivered by certified nurse-midwives versus those delivered by physicians was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.55, 0.91). Midwifery care was associated with a lower risk of abnormal labor (adjusted odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.60, 0.83) and diagnosis of fetal distress (adjusted odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.32, 0.77).
CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates that labor abnormalities and diagnosis of fetal distress are less frequent in patients cared for by nurse-midwives, and there is an association with a lower incidence of cesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8166781     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90773-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Provider distribution and variations in statewide cesarean section rates.

Authors:  W J Hueston; S Lewis-Stevenson
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-02

2.  Accuracy of birth certificate and hospital discharge data: a certified nurse-midwife and physician comparison.

Authors:  Heather M Bradford; Vicky Cárdenas; Katherine Camacho-Carr; Mona T Lydon-Rochelle
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-02-06

3.  Nurse-midwifery. The beneficial alternative.

Authors:  M Gabay; S M Wolfe
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Labor Intervention and Outcomes in Women Who Are Nulliparous and Obese: Comparison of Nurse-Midwife to Obstetrician Intrapartum Care.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Elizabeth J Corwin; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Predictors of cesarean section delivery among college-educated black and white women, Davidson County, Tennessee, 1990-1994.

Authors:  A O Scott-Wright; T M Flanagan; R M Wrona
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  How often is a low Apgar score the result of substandard care during labour?

Authors:  S Berglund; H Pettersson; S Cnattingius; C Grunewald
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Midwifery care, social and medical risk factors, and birth outcomes in the USA.

Authors:  M F MacDorman; G K Singh
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.710

8.  A Native American community with a 7% cesarean delivery rate: does case mix, ethnicity, or labor management explain the low rate?

Authors:  Lawrence Leeman; Rebecca Leeman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Geographic variation in cesarean delivery in the United States by payer.

Authors:  Rachel Mosher Henke; Lauren M Wier; William D Marder; Bernard S Friedman; Herbert S Wong
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.