Literature DB >> 28099786

Labor Intervention and Outcomes in Women Who Are Nulliparous and Obese: Comparison of Nurse-Midwife to Obstetrician Intrapartum Care.

Nicole S Carlson, Elizabeth J Corwin, Nancy K Lowe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women who are obese have slower labors than women of normal weight, and show reduced response to interventions designed to speed labor progress like oxytocin augmentation and artificial rupture of membranes. The optimal labor management for these women has not been described.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared 2 propensity score-matched groups of women (N = 360) who were healthy, nulliparous, spontaneously laboring, and obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 ). Labors were managed by either a certified nurse-midwife (CNM) or an obstetrician at one hospital from 2005 through 2012. Comparisons were made on a range of labor processes and outcomes.
RESULTS: Women who were obese and cared for in labor by CNMs were 87.0% less likely to have operative vaginal birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.06-0.41) and 76.3% less likely to have third- or fourth-degree perineal lacerations (aOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13-0.79) compared to a matched group of women who were obese and had similarly sized neonates but who were cared for by obstetricians. The rates of unplanned cesarean birth, postpartum hemorrhage, maternal intrapartum fever, and neonatal intensive care unit admission were similar between groups. CNM patients were significantly less likely than patients of obstetricians to have labor anesthesia, synthetic oxytocin augmentation, or intrauterine pressure catheters. By contrast, CNM patients were significantly more likely than patients of obstetricians to use physiologic labor interventions, including intermittent fetal monitoring, ambulation, and hydrotherapy. DISCUSSION: In women with spontaneous labor onset who were healthy, obese, and nulliparous, watchful waiting and use of physiologic labor interventions, characterizing CNM intrapartum care, were associated with outcomes that were similar to, or better than, those of women who were obese and exposed to more high-technology interventions characterizing intrapartum care by obstetricians. In women who were obese, physiologic labor interventions were safe for both mothers and neonates.
© 2017 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cesarean birth; hydrotherapy; interventions; intrapartum; labor; labor dystocia; obesity; physiologic labor; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28099786      PMCID: PMC5726520          DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  33 in total

1.  Measuring outcomes of midwifery care: development of an instrument to assess optimality.

Authors:  P A Murphy; J T Fullerton
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 3.  Intrapartum management associated with obesity in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Nancy K Lowe
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.388

4.  Risk of first-stage and second-stage cesarean delivery by maternal body mass index among nulliparous women in labor at term.

Authors:  Elaine M Fyfe; Ngaire H Anderson; Robyn A North; Eliza H Y Chan; Rennae S Taylor; Gustaaf A Dekker; Lesley M E McCowan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The effect of maternal obesity on the rate of failed induction of labor.

Authors:  Katherine B Wolfe; Rocco A Rossi; Carri R Warshak
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Obesity, diabetes, and the risk of infections diagnosed in hospital and post-discharge infections after cesarean section: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rita Andersen Leth; Niels Uldbjerg; Mette Nørgaard; Jens Kjølseth Møller; Reimar Wernich Thomsen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 7.  Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Y Chu; S Y Kim; C H Schmid; P M Dietz; W M Callaghan; J Lau; K M Curtis
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.213

8.  Economic evaluation of birth care in low-risk women. A comparison between a midwife-led birth unit and a standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in Norway. A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Stine Bernitz; Eline Aas; Pål Øian
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 2.372

9.  Supportive nurse-midwife care is associated with a reduced incidence of cesarean section.

Authors:  J Butler; B Abrams; J Parker; J M Roberts; R K Laros
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Parturition dysfunction in obesity: time to target the pathobiology.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Teri L Hernandez; K Joseph Hurt
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.211

View more
  3 in total

1.  Preventing Cesarean Birth in Women with Obesity: Influence of Unit-Level Midwifery Presence on Use of Cesarean among Women in the Consortium on Safe Labor Data Set.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Rachel Breman; Jeremy L Neal; Julia C Phillippi
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Three machine learning algorithms and their utility in exploring risk factors associated with primary cesarean section in low-risk women: A methods paper.

Authors:  Rebecca R S Clark; Jintong Hou
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Birth Outcomes of Women with Obesity Enrolled for Care at Freestanding Birth Centers in the United States.

Authors:  Cecilia M Jevitt; Susan Stapleton; Yanhong Deng; Xuemei Song; Kaicheng Wang; Diana R Jolles
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.