Literature DB >> 9323389

Nurse-midwifery. The beneficial alternative.

M Gabay1, S M Wolfe.   

Abstract

The number of nurse-midwife-attended births in U.S. hospitals has jumped ten-fold in the last 20 years, rising from just 19,686 in 1975 to 196,977 in 1994. Certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) focus on childbirth as a normal event, emphasizing the educational and psychosocial aspects of care and the judicious use of technological interventions. CNM care appears particularly well suited to help solve two difficult problems in U.S. obstetric care--our country's slow progress in improving the health status of newborns and the excessive use of medical interventions during childbirth. Despite the fact that CNM care has been found to be safe and cost-effective, only a small fraction of those pregnant women who could benefit from CNM care use midwifery services. Lack of consumer awareness is part of the problem, but barriers also exist to accessing CNM services. Sixty-four percent of CNM practices responding to a survey reported practice restrictions, most commonly due to state laws, hospital policies, and inappropriately restrictive physician back-up. One state, Florida, is aggressively promoting the use of CNM care as the standard of practice for healthy pregnant women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9323389      PMCID: PMC1381945     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  11 in total

1.  Hospital care and the vanishing midwife.

Authors:  P H JACOBSON
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1956-07

2.  The perinatal paradox: doing more and accomplishing less.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Intrapartum fetal monitoring--a disappointing story.

Authors:  R Freeman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  A randomized, controlled trial of nurse-midwifery care.

Authors:  S Harvey; J Jarrell; R Brant; C Stainton; D Rach
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Annual summary of vital statistics--1971.

Authors:  M E Wegman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Midwives to manage uncomplicated childbirth.

Authors:  R Lilford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-07

7.  The role of selection bias in comparing cesarean birth rates between physician and midwifery management.

Authors:  L R Chambliss; C Daly; A L Medearis; M Ames; M Kayne; R Paul
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 8.  Annual summary of vital statistics--1995.

Authors:  B Guyer; D M Strobino; S J Ventura; M MacDorman; J A Martin
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Supportive nurse-midwife care is associated with a reduced incidence of cesarean section.

Authors:  J Butler; B Abrams; J Parker; J M Roberts; R K Laros
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Birth choices, the law, and medicine: balancing individual freedoms and protection of the public's health.

Authors:  C Hafner-Eaton; L K Pearce
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.265

View more
  4 in total

1.  The midwife as an "Instrument" of care.

Authors:  Holly Powell Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Not either/or, but obstetricians and midwives together.

Authors:  H C Lawrence
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Characteristics of nurse-midwife patients and visits, 1991.

Authors:  L L Paine; J M Lang; D M Strobino; T R Johnson; J F DeJoseph; E R Declercq; D R Gagnon; A Scupholme; A Ross
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The experience of perinatal care at a birthing center: a qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Amber T Pewitt
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2008
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.