Literature DB >> 8156266

Transdermal fentanyl in uncontrolled cancer pain: titration on a day-to-day basis as a procedure for safe and effective dose finding--a pilot study in 20 patients.

W Korte1, R Morant.   

Abstract

All communications on the use of transdermal fentanyl as well as the recommendations of the manufacturer include the direction that patients should be titrated with a short-acting narcotic to control their cancer pain before they are converted to a fentanyl transdermal therapeutic system (TTS). We investigated the possibility of avoiding this titration phase by immediate fentanyl TTS therapy in patients with uncontrolled cancer pain. Dose finding was performed by direct titration of fentanyl TTS according to clinical necessity on a day-to-day basis. Morphine solution for rescue medication was available. Short-term follow-up was 28 days, and 20 patients (10 in- and 10 outpatients) were evaluable. On the average, sufficient pain control [visual analogue scale (VAS) < 35 mm] was reached within 48 h of the start of fentanyl TTS. The mean VAS values before and during fentanyl TTS therapy were 53 mm (before), 27 mm (week 1), 21 mm (week 2), 18 mm (week 3) and 21 mm (week 4). There were statistically significant lower VAS values at all follow-up times compared to pretreatment values (e.g. pretreatment to day 1: P = 0.019; pretreatment to day 28: P = 0.002; Wilcoxon sign-rank test). The mean fentanyl TTS doses were 70 micrograms/h (week 1), 98 micrograms/h (week 2), 107 micrograms/h (week 3) and 116 micrograms/h (week 4). The differences of mean fentanyl TTS does were significantly different between days 1 and 7 (P < 0.001) and between days 8 and 14 (P = 0.006), but not between days 15 and 21 and days 22 and 28.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8156266     DOI: 10.1007/bf00572094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  10 in total

1.  Package inserts and other dosage guidelines are especially useful with new analgesics and new analgesic delivery systems.

Authors:  P L Bailey; T H Stanley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  A long-term survey of morphine in cancer pain patients.

Authors:  S A Schug; D Zech; S Grond; H Jung; T Meuser; B Stobbe
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 3.  Transdermal fentanyl in cancer pain.

Authors:  K H Mosser
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.292

4.  [The estimation of the i.m. morphine-equivalent in cancer pain treatment with different opioids or different routes of administrations. Practical meaning and limitations.].

Authors:  J Jage; R K Portenoy; K M Foley
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of morphine.

Authors:  P A Glare; T D Walsh
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Transdermal fentanyl for pain control in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Angela W Miser; Prem K Narang; Judith A Dothage; Robert C Young; William Sindelar; James S Miser
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  Transdermal fentanyl and initial dose-finding with patient-controlled analgesia in cancer pain. A pilot study with 20 terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Detlev F J Zech; Stefan U A Grond; John Lynch; Hans G Dauer; Bernd Stollenwerk; Klaus A Lehmann
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Plasma morphine and morphine-6-glucuronide patterns in cancer patients after oral, subcutaneous, sublabial and rectal short-term administration.

Authors:  M Breda; M Bianchi; C Ripamonti; E Zecca; V Ventafridda; A E Panerai
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Res       Date:  1991

Review 9.  A review of contact dermatitis associated with transdermal therapeutic systems.

Authors:  M R Holdiness
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  Transdermal fentanyl for cancer pain. Repeated dose pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  R K Portenoy; M A Southam; S K Gupta; J Lapin; M Layman; C E Inturrisi; K M Foley
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.892

  10 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Transdermal fentanyl. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in pain control.

Authors:  W Jeal; P Benfield
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Day-to-day titration of transdermal fentanyl is unwise.

Authors:  D Brooks
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of transdermal opioids: focus on transdermal fentanyl.

Authors:  S Grond; L Radbruch; K A Lehmann
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Opioid analgesics: comparative features and prescribing guidelines.

Authors:  N I Cherny
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Transdermal fentanyl: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in chronic cancer pain control.

Authors:  R B Muijsers; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Supportive and palliative care of cancer patients at the Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Switzerland.

Authors:  N D de Stoutz; A Glaus
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Patient-reported outcomes as a component of the primary endpoint in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  S Gail Eckhardt; Peter De Porre; David Smith; Joan Maurel; William P Steward; Olivier Bouche; Helgi van de Velde; Bart Michiels; Roland Bugat
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 3.612

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.