Literature DB >> 11772140

Transdermal fentanyl: an updated review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in chronic cancer pain control.

R B Muijsers1, A J Wagstaff.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid agonist which interacts primarily with the mu-opioid receptor. The low molecular weight, high potency and lipid solubility of fentanyl make it suitable for delivery by the transdermal therapeutic system. These patches are designed to deliver fentanyl at a constant rate (25, 50, 75 and 100 microg/h), and require replacement every 3 days. Data from randomised, nonblind trials suggest that transdermal fentanyl is as effective as sustained-release oral morphine in the treatment of chronic cancer pain, as reported by patients using visual and numerical analogue scales as well as verbal description scales. No obvious differences in health-related quality of life were found in patients with chronic cancer pain when comparing transdermal fentanyl with sustained-release oral morphine. Nevertheless, significantly more patients expressed a preference for transdermal fentanyl than for sustained-release oral morphine after a randomised, nonblind, crossover trial. Because of the formation of a fentanyl depot in the skin tissue, serum fentanyl concentrations increase gradually following initial application, generally levelling off between 12 and 24 hours. Thereafter, they remain relatively constant, with some fluctuation, for the remainder of the 72-hour application period. Once achieved, steady-state plasma fentanyl concentrations can be maintained for as long as the patches are renewed. The most frequently observed adverse events during transdermal fentanyl administration (as with other opioid agonists) included vomiting, nausea and constipation. Data from a nonblind, randomised trials suggest that constipation occurs less frequently in patients receiving transdermal fentanyl than in those given sustained-release oral morphine. The most serious adverse event reported in US premarketing trials was hypoventilation, which occurred with an incidence of approximately 2%. Adverse reactions related to skin and appendages (i.e. rash and application site reactions - erythema, papules, itching and oedema) were reported in 153 patients with cancer at a frequency between 1 and 3%.
CONCLUSION: Transdermal fentanyl is a useful opioid-agonist for the treatment of moderate to severe chronic cancer pain. The advantages of transdermal fentanyl include ease of administration and the 3-day application interval. These factors coupled with a lower incidence of constipation are likely to contribute to the reported patient preference of transdermal fentanyl over sustained-release oral morphine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11772140     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200161150-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  56 in total

1.  A survey of transdermal fentanyl use in a major cancer center.

Authors:  J R Hardy; E A Rees
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.612

2.  Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained-release oral morphine in cancer pain: preference, efficacy, and quality of life. The TTS-Fentanyl Comparative Trial Group.

Authors:  S Ahmedzai; D Brooks
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Comparison of oral controlled-release morphine with transdermal fentanyl in terminal cancer pain.

Authors:  J O Wong; G L Chiu; C J Tsao; C L Chang
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Sin       Date:  1997-03

Review 4.  Cancer pain management.

Authors:  H M Chang
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.456

5.  Randomised crossover trial of transdermal fentanyl and sustained release oral morphine for treating chronic non-cancer pain.

Authors:  L Allan; H Hays; N H Jensen; B L de Waroux; M Bolt; R Donald; E Kalso
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-12

6.  Transdermal fentanyl in opioid-naive cancer pain patients: an open trial using transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of chronic cancer pain in opioid-naive patients and a group using codeine.

Authors:  A P Vielvoye-Kerkmeer; C Mattern; M P Uitendaal
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Absorption characteristics of transdermally administered fentanyl.

Authors:  J R Varvel; S L Shafer; S S Hwang; P A Coen; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.892

8.  Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; J H Edmonson; R H Blum; J A Stewart; K J Pandya
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Transdermal fentanyl in uncontrolled cancer pain: titration on a day-to-day basis as a procedure for safe and effective dose finding--a pilot study in 20 patients.

Authors:  W Korte; R Morant
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Direct conversion from oral morphine to transdermal fentanyl: a multicenter study in patients with cancer pain.

Authors:  Barbara Donner; Michael Zenz; Michael Tryba; Michael Strumpf
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  55 in total

1.  Report of a patient chewing fentanyl patches who was titrated onto methadone.

Authors:  Eric Dale; Fleur Ashby; Kalyan Seelam
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-11-24

Review 2.  The fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS): an alternative to intravenous patient-controlled analgesia in the postoperative setting.

Authors:  Raymond Sinatra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Fatal outcome in a child after ingestion of a transdermal fentanyl patch.

Authors:  Jörg Teske; Jens-Peter Weller; Klaus Larsch; Hans Dieter Tröger; Matthias Karst
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Effects of application site and subject demographics on the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl HCl patient-controlled transdermal system (PCTS).

Authors:  Suneel K Gupta; Stephen Hwang; Mary Southam; Gayatri Sathyan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  The role of opioids in cancer pain.

Authors:  Columba Quigley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-08

6.  Reservoir based fentanyl transdermal drug delivery systems: effect of patch age on drug release and skin permeation.

Authors:  Suneela Prodduturi; Glen J Smith; Anna M Wokovich; William H Doub; Benjamin J Westenberger; Lucinda Buhse
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 7.  Bioequivalence criteria for transdermal fentanyl generics: do these need a relook?

Authors:  Carmen Walter; Lisa Felden; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  The effects of buprenorphine on fentanyl withdrawal in rats.

Authors:  Adrie W Bruijnzeel; Catherine Marcinkiewcz; Shani Isaac; Matthew M Booth; Donn M Dennis; Mark S Gold
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Effect of voriconazole and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous fentanyl.

Authors:  Teijo I Saari; Kari Laine; Mikko Neuvonen; Pertti J Neuvonen; Klaus T Olkkola
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Pain treatment with opioids : achieving the minimal effective and the minimal interacting dose.

Authors:  Pierangelo Geppetti; Silvia Benemei
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.