Literature DB >> 9010652

Transdermal fentanyl. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in pain control.

W Jeal1, P Benfield.   

Abstract

Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid with short-acting analgesic activity after intravenous or subcutaneous administration. The low molecular weight, high potency and lipid solubility of fentanyl make it suitable for delivery via the transdermal therapeutic system (TTS). These systems are designed to release the drug into the skin at a constant rate ranging from 25 to 100 micrograms/h, multiple systems can be applied to achieve higher delivery rates. Initially, much of the clinical experience with fentanyl TTS was obtained in patients with acute postoperative pain. However, because of the increased risk of respiratory complications, fentanyl TTS is contraindicated in this setting. Fentanyl TTS is recommended for use in chronic cancer pain. Moreover, in 11 countries worldwide including the US, its use is not restricted to chronic cancer pain; the drug is also available for treatment of general chronic pain, including that of nonmalignant origin. At the start of fentanyl TTS treatment, depot accumulation of the drug within skin tissue results in a significant delay (17 to 48 hours) before maximum plasma concentration is achieved. Approximately half of the cancer patients converted to transdermal fentanyl from other opioid agents required increased dosages after initial application of the patch. However, concomitant use of short-acting morphine maintained pain relief during the titration period, and the use of such supplementary medication decreased with the duration of fentanyl TTS treatment. In patients with chronic cancer pain, changes in visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores ranged from a 10% increase (worse pain) to > 50% decrease (less pain) during transdermal fentanyl therapy compared with previous opioid treatment. In addition, patient preference for fentanyl TTS was indicated by the number of patient requests (up to 95%) for continued use of the drug at the end of the study. Although fentanyl TTS is contraindicated in patients postoperatively, the efficacy of fentanyl via the transdermal route was investigated in this patient group. Supplementary patient controlled analgesia was significantly reduced in patients who received fentanyl TTS 75 micrograms/h compared with placebo, although this was not apparent until > or = 12 hours after application. Data evaluating pain relief, which was assessed by VAS pain scores, were inconclusive. Preliminary data, although from relatively small numbers of patients, indicate that transdermal fentanyl may be useful in the management of chronic non-malignant pain. Indeed, some patients whose pain was previously uncontrolled became completely pain free. The most frequently occurring adverse events during fentanyl TTS therapy (as with other opioid agents) included vomiting, nausea and constipation, although vomiting and nausea were not clearly associated with the drug. The most serious adverse event was hypoventilation, which occurred more frequently in postoperative (4%) than in cancer patients (2%). In surgical patients, fentanyl-associated respiratory events (reduced respiratory rate and apnoea) generally occurred within 24 hours of patch application; however, there were isolated reports of late onset (> or = 36 hours postsurgery) fentanyl-associated respiratory depression. In cancer patients, the incidence of constipation was reduced by up to two-thirds after switching from oral morphine to transdermal fentanyl. Transient skin irritation associated with the plastic patch or the adhesive, rather than the drug, was reported in a maximum 3% of patients. In summary, transdermal fentanyl is a useful alternative to other opioid agents, which are also recommended on the third step of the WHO analgesic ladder, in the management of chronic malignant pain. Preliminary data indicate that it may be useful in the management of chronic nonmalignant pain. The advantages offered by fentanyl TTS over traditional methods of chronic pain control include its ease of administration, less constipation and the 3-

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9010652     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199753010-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  65 in total

Review 1.  Transdermal drug delivery and cutaneous metabolism.

Authors:  R H Guy; J Hadgraft; D A Bucks
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 1.908

2.  Transdermal fentanyl versus sustained-release oral morphine in cancer pain: preference, efficacy, and quality of life. The TTS-Fentanyl Comparative Trial Group.

Authors:  S Ahmedzai; D Brooks
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.612

3.  Withdrawal with transdermal fentanyl.

Authors:  C M Higgs; J Vella-Brincat
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  Transdermal fentanyl for the treatment of pain after major urological operations. A randomized double-blind comparison with placebo using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  K A Lehmann; C Einnolf; H J Eberlein; R Nagel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Transdermal fentanyl for pain control in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Angela W Miser; Prem K Narang; Judith A Dothage; Robert C Young; William Sindelar; James S Miser
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 6.961

6.  A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of transdermal fentanyl after abdominal hysterectomy. Analgesic, respiratory, and pharmacokinetic effects.

Authors:  A N Sandler; A D Baxter; J Katz; B Samson; M Friedlander; P Norman; G Koren; S Roger; K Hull; J Klein
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Transdermal fentanyl: clinical trial at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.

Authors:  R Slover
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Transdermal fentanyl in uncontrolled cancer pain: titration on a day-to-day basis as a procedure for safe and effective dose finding--a pilot study in 20 patients.

Authors:  W Korte; R Morant
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Guidelines for the clinical use of transdermal fentanyl.

Authors:  R Payne; S Chandler; M Einhaus
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.248

10.  Chronic use of opioid analgesics in non-malignant pain: report of 38 cases.

Authors:  Russell K Portenoy; Kathleen M Foley
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  51 in total

1.  Novel Drug Delivery Systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

2.  Transdermal fentanyl for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Seiji Ohtori; Gen Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Nobuyasu Ochiai; Shunji Kishida; Masashi Takaso; Yasuchika Aoki; Kazuki Kuniyoshi; Junichi Nakamura; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Gen Arai; Masayuki Miyagi; Hiroto Kamoda; Miyako Suzuki; Tomoaki Toyone; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Effect of transdermal opioids in experimentally induced superficial, deep and hyperalgesic pain.

Authors:  T Andresen; C Staahl; A Oksche; H Mansikka; L Arendt-Nielsen; A M Drewes
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 4.  MicroRNAs in opioid pharmacology.

Authors:  Cheol Kyu Hwang; Yadav Wagley; Ping-Yee Law; Li-Na Wei; Horace H Loh
Journal:  J Neuroimmune Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Comparative bioequivalence study between a novel matrix transdermal delivery system of fentanyl and a commercially available reservoir formulation.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Marier; Mary Lor; Josée Morin; Lionel Roux; Marika Di Marco; Gaetano Morelli; Eva Aggerholm Saedder
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Pain patch.

Authors:  Dori Seccareccia
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  The role of transdermal fentanyl in palliative care: a case study series.

Authors:  L O'Síoráin
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

8.  Effect of dose escalation with single opioid, fentanyl matrix in patients not controlling cancer pain: a multicenter, prospective, observational study in Korea.

Authors:  Sung Ae Koh; Kyung Hee Lee; Mi Jung Kim; Kyu Taek Lee; Seung Woo Park; Seung Hyun Nam; Hun Mo Ryoo
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 4.679

Review 9.  Recent advances: control of chronic pain.

Authors:  T J Nurmikko; T P Nash; J R Wiles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-21

Review 10.  Fentanyl-related compounds and derivatives: current status and future prospects for pharmaceutical applications.

Authors:  Ruben S Vardanyan; Victor J Hruby
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.