Literature DB >> 2057987

Clinical pharmacokinetics of morphine.

P A Glare1, T D Walsh.   

Abstract

Morphine (M) is recommended by the World Health Organization as the treatment of choice for moderate-to-severe cancer pain. Development of sensitive radioimmunoassays (RIA) and high-performance liquid chromatography in the past 20 years has allowed study of the pharmacokinetics of M, which remain incompletely understood. Data derived by RIA must be interpreted with caution due to cross-reactivity with anti-sera by metabolites, impairing assay specificity. The pharmacokinetics of M have been determined for various clinical situations, but there is large interpatient variability for most parameters. M is readily absorbed from all routes of administration, except transdermal, and it can be injected spinally. Peak plasma levels are achieved within 15-20 min of intramuscular and subcutaneous administration, and within 30-90 min after oral. Peak levels after oral administration are much lower than after parenteral routes, since oral M undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver. With repeated administration, the oral-parenteral relative potency ratio is 1:3 M can be administered epidurally or intrathecally and has also been given intracerebroventricularly. Epidural M enters the subarachnoid space, but is also absorbed into the systemic circulation. Only 5% of a dose crosses the dura. M administered in the lumbar region is quickly redistributed in the cerebrospinal fluid in a rostral direction, explaining the high incidence of systemic side effects following spinal administration. After absorption, M is rapidly and widely distributed and crosses the blood-brain barrier. With therapeutic doses, plasma protein binding is only 20-35%, and the volume of distribution is 1-6 L/kg. The primary site of M metabolism is the liver, and the dose should be reduced in patients with liver disease. Glucuronidation is the main metabolic pathway, but the principal metabolite, morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), is inactive. Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is produced in smaller amounts than M3G, but is pharmacologically active and many times more potent than M. The ratio of M6G to M in plasma, after a dose of M, is approximately 10:1, and the ratio does not change with increasing doses or prolonged treatment. Normorphine (NM) is also active, and is formed to a greater extent after oral administration; it is not, however, usually found in plasma. NM may be neurotoxic. M and its metabolites are excreted by the kidney, but urinary free M accounts for less than 10% of an administered dose. In patients with renal insufficiency, the metabolites accumulate, though M itself is still excreted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2057987     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-199101000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  42 in total

1.  Morphine induced allodynia in a child with brain tumour.

Authors:  S Heger; C Maier; K Otter; U Helwig; M Suttorp
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-04

2.  Increased clearance of morphine in sickle cell disease: implications for pain management.

Authors:  Deepika S Darbari; Michael Neely; John van den Anker; Sohail Rana
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 3.  Contribution to variability in response to opioids.

Authors:  Geoffrey W Hanks; Colette Reid
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  First dose in children: physiological insights into pharmacokinetic scaling approaches and their implications in paediatric drug development.

Authors:  Ashley Strougo; Thomas Eissing; Ashraf Yassen; Stefan Willmann; Meindert Danhof; Jan Freijer
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 2.745

5.  [Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): Antirheumatic, anti-pyretic or analgesic drugs?].

Authors:  K Brune
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 6.  Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease.

Authors:  I Tegeder; J Lötsch; G Geisslinger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles of illicit drug use and treatment of illicit drug users.

Authors:  D I Quinn; A Wodak; R O Day
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Predicting and Understanding the Human Microbiome's Impact on Pharmacology.

Authors:  Reese Hitchings; Libusha Kelly
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 14.819

9.  The effect of plasticizers on the erosion and mechanical properties of polymeric films.

Authors:  Cheryl L Rabek; Rachel Van Stelle; Thomas D Dziubla; David A Puleo
Journal:  J Biomater Appl       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of oxycodone after intramuscular and oral administration to healthy subjects.

Authors:  R Pöyhiä; T Seppälä; K T Olkkola; E Kalso
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.