Literature DB >> 8138789

Incongruous item generation effects: a multiple-cue perspective.

S A Soraci1, J J Franks, J D Bransford, R A Chechile, R F Belli, M Carr, M Carlin.   

Abstract

In a series of studies, generation effects were obtained under encoding conditions designed to induce incongruous, unrelated item generation. Experiments 1 and 2, using free- and cued-recall measures, respectively, provided evidence that this unrelated generation effect was due to response-specific processing. Experiment 3 demonstrated a lack of relation between free recall and indices of clustering. A preliminary protocol study suggested that Ss generate multiple items in their search for appropriate unrelated responses. In Experiments 4 and 5, conditions designed to produce more extensive multiple generations demonstrated enhanced free recall. These results supported a multiple-cue account of facilitated recall for incongruous item generation. The multiple-cue perspective is consistent with traditional conceptualizations of memory, such as the principle of congruity, and contemporary distinctions between cue-target relational and item-specific processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8138789     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.20.1.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  11 in total

1.  "Aha" effects in the generation of pictures.

Authors:  T W Wills; S A Soraci; R A Chechile; H A Taylor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

2.  The self-choice effect from a multiple-cue perspective.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Watanabe; Sal A Soraci
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

3.  When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?

Authors:  Phillip J Grimaldi; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

4.  Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Edward L DeLosh
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  The generation effect: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Sharon Bertsch; Bryan J Pesta; Richard Wiscott; Michael A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

6.  Revising what readers know: updating text representations during narrative comprehension.

Authors:  David N Rapp; Panayiota Kendeou
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

7.  The effects of "effort after meaning" on recall: differences in within- and between-subjects designs.

Authors:  Franklin M Zaromb; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-06

8.  Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

9.  The time-course of the generation effect.

Authors:  R W Smith; A F Healy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-01

10.  Memory availability and referential access.

Authors:  Clinton L Johns; Peter C Gordon; Debra L Long; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.