Literature DB >> 18265617

Revising what readers know: updating text representations during narrative comprehension.

David N Rapp1, Panayiota Kendeou.   

Abstract

Reading comprehension involves not just encoding information into memory, but also updating and revising what is already known or believed. For example, as narrative plots unfold, readers often must revise the expectations they have constructed from earlier portions of text to successfully comprehend later events. Evidence suggests that such revision is by no means guaranteed. In three experiments, we examined conditions that influence readers' revision of trait-based models for story characters. Trait models are particularly relevant for examining such revision because they demonstrate resistance to change. We specifically assessed whether task instructions and content-driven refutations of earlier information would enhance the likelihood of revision. In Experiment 1, instructions to carefully consider the appropriateness of story outcomes generally facilitated revision. In Experiment 2, we removed those instructions; revision occurred only when refutations included sufficient explanation to suggest that updating was necessary. Experiment 3 further supported the influence of instructions on readers' propensities to revise. These results are informative with respect to the mechanisms that guide readers' moment-by-moment comprehension of unfolding narratives.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18265617     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  20 in total

1.  Strategic influence on the time course of predictive inferences in reading.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; M Dolores Castillo; Franz Schmalhofer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

2.  Updating a situation model: a memory-based text processing view.

Authors:  E J O'Brien; M L Rizzella; J E Albrecht; J G Halleran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory.

Authors:  R A Zwaan; G A Radvansky
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  How Automatically Do Readers Infer Fictional Characters' Emotional States?

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; Brenda M Hallada; Rachel R W Robertson
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  1998-07

5.  Do Readers Mentally Represent Characters' Emotional States?

Authors:  Morton Ann Gernsbacher; H Hill Goldsmith; Rachel R W Robertson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  1992

6.  Inferences about predictable events.

Authors:  G McKoon; R Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  The role of perspective in the accessibility of goals during reading.

Authors:  J E Albrecht; E J O'Brien; R A Mason; J L Myers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Incongruous item generation effects: a multiple-cue perspective.

Authors:  S A Soraci; J J Franks; J D Bransford; R A Chechile; R F Belli; M Carr; M Carlin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  When are social judgments made? Evidence for the spontaneousness of trait inferences.

Authors:  L Winter; J S Uleman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1984-08

10.  Backward updating of mental models during continuous reading of narratives.

Authors:  M de Vega
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  9 in total

1.  Readers' use of source information in text comprehension.

Authors:  Jason L G Braasch; Jean-François Rouet; Nicolas Vibert; M Anne Britt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

2.  Tracking spatial information during reading: a cue-based process.

Authors:  Emily R Smith; Edward J O'Brien
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

3.  Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; David T W Tang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

4.  Evil geniuses: inferences derived from evidence and preferences.

Authors:  Michael C Mensink; David N Rapp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-08

5.  Inferential revision in narrative texts: An ERP study.

Authors:  Ana Pérez; Kate Cain; María C Castellanos; Teresa Bajo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-11

6.  Would a madman have been so wise as this?" The effects of source credibility and message credibility on validation.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Foy; Paul C LoCasto; Stephen W Briner; Samantha Dyar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-02

7.  Failure to accept retractions: A contribution to the continued influence effect.

Authors:  Andrea E O'Rear; Gabriel A Radvansky
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

8.  Prior knowledge of character locational stereotypes and representations during text comprehension.

Authors:  Takatsugu Kojima
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2015-09

9.  How do readers handle incorrect information during reading?

Authors:  David N Rapp
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.