Literature DB >> 15117004

The self-choice effect from a multiple-cue perspective.

Tomoyuki Watanabe1, Sal A Soraci.   

Abstract

The self-choice effect refers to the fact that self-chosen items are remembered better than experimenter-assigned items (Takahashi, 1991). The present study investigated the hypothesis that (a) response choice involves relational processing as activation of both target and context items, and (b) such activated context items are effective as potential retrieval cues for recall of target items. In the experiment, participants chose (choice condition) or were assigned (force condition) a target to remember for each trial. Prior to free recall of the target items, context words, related new words, or unrelated words were presented in a recognition task as potential retrieval cues. The results of a subsequent free recall test indicated that the incidental cues were more effective in the choice condition than in the force condition. Also, recognition resulted in a greater rate of successfully recognized context words at the cost of increasing falsely recognized related new words in the choice condition in comparison with the force condition. These results indicated that response choice activates context items at encoding, which operate as potential retrieval cues for recall of target items. Such cuing mechanisms operative in the self-choice effect are consistent with the multiple-cue theory proposed by Soraci et al. (1994; see also Soraci et al., 1999) for generative processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15117004     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  5 in total

1.  Recall accuracy and illusory memories: when more is less.

Authors:  M P Toglia; J S Neuschatz; K A Goodwin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1999-03

2.  Associative false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts.

Authors:  D A Gallo; H L Roediger; K B McDermott
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  The self-choice elaboration effects on incidental memory of Japanese historical facts.

Authors:  H Toyota; M Tsujimura
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2000-08

4.  Incongruous item generation effects: a multiple-cue perspective.

Authors:  S A Soraci; J J Franks; J D Bransford; R A Chechile; R F Belli; M Carr; M Carlin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: a persisting enigma in memory research.

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-11
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  The effect of choice on intentional and incidental memory.

Authors:  Zhuolei Ding; Ting Jiang; Chuansheng Chen; Vishnu P Murty; Jingming Xue; Mingxia Zhang
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  The relationship between trait empathy and memory formation for social vs. non-social information.

Authors:  Ullrich Wagner; Lisa Handke; Henrik Walter
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2015-02-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.