Literature DB >> 24713065

Transmission advantage favors selfing allele in experimental populations of self-incompatible Witheringia solanacea (solanaceae).

Judy L Stone1, Emily J VanWyk, Jennifer R Hale.   

Abstract

The evolution of self-fertilization is one of the most commonly traversed transitions in flowering plants, with profound implications for population genetic structure and evolutionary potential. We investigated factors influencing this transition using Witheringia solanacea, a predominantly self-incompatible (SI) species within which self-compatible (SC) genotypes have been identified. We showed that self-compatibility in this species segregates with variation at the S-locus as inherited by plants in F1 and F2 generations. To examine reproductive assurance and the transmission advantage of selfing, we placed SC and SI genotypes in genetically replicated gardens and monitored male and female reproductive success, as well as selfing rates of SC plants. Self-compatibility did not lead to increased fruit or seed set, even under conditions of pollinator scarcity, and the realized selfing rate of SC plants was less than 10%. SC plants had higher fruit abortion rates, consistent with previous evidence showing strong inbreeding depression at the embryonic stage. Although the selfing allele did not provide reproductive assurance under observed conditions, it also did not cause pollen discounting, so the transmission advantage of selfing should promote its spread. Given observed numbers of S-alleles and selfing rates, self-compatibility should spread even under conditions of exceedingly high initial inbreeding depression.
© 2014 The Author(s). Evolution © 2014 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embryonic inbreeding depression; mating system; pollen discounting; reproductive assurance; seed discounting; self-fertilization; self-incompatibility

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24713065      PMCID: PMC4079751          DOI: 10.1111/evo.12419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  26 in total

Review 1.  Molecular mechanisms underlying the breakdown of gametophytic self-incompatibility.

Authors:  J L Stone
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating.

Authors:  Alice A Winn; Elizabeth Elle; Susan Kalisz; Pierre-Olivier Cheptou; Christopher G Eckert; Carol Goodwillie; Mark O Johnston; David A Moeller; Richard H Ree; Risa D Sargent; Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Species selection maintains self-incompatibility.

Authors:  Emma E Goldberg; Joshua R Kohn; Russell Lande; Kelly A Robertson; Stephen A Smith; Boris Igić
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Geographic structure of pollinator communities, reproductive assurance, and the evolution of self-pollination.

Authors:  David A Moeller
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Impact of mating systems on patterns of sequence polymorphism in flowering plants.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin; Eric Bazin; Deborah Charlesworth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The relative importance of reproductive assurance and automatic selection as hypotheses for the evolution of self-fertilization.

Authors:  Jeremiah W Busch; Lynda F Delph
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  A model for the evolution of self-fertilization and vegetative reproduction.

Authors:  T Nagylaki
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1976-05-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Rapid recent radiation of S-RNase lineages in Witheringia solanacea (Solanaceae).

Authors:  J L Stone; S E Pierce
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Ecological context of the evolution of self-pollination in Clarkia xantiana: population size, plant communities, and reproductive assurance.

Authors:  David A Moeller; Monica A Geber
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) gray (Liliaceae).

Authors:  P E Smouse; T R Meagher
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sibling competition does not magnify inbreeding depression in North American Arabidopsis lyrata.

Authors:  Yan Li; Mark van Kleunen; Marc Stift
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Reproductive assurance drives transitions to self-fertilization in experimental Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Ioannis Theologidis; Ivo M Chelo; Christine Goy; Henrique Teotónio
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 7.431

3.  Population genetics of self-incompatibility in a clade of relict cliff-dwelling plant species.

Authors:  Jose L Silva; Adrian C Brennan; José A Mejías
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  Resolving the conundrum of inbreeding depression but no inbreeding avoidance: Estimating sex-specific selection on inbreeding by song sparrows (Melospiza melodia).

Authors:  Jane M Reid; Peter Arcese; Greta Bocedi; A Bradley Duthie; Matthew E Wolak; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Intraspecific breakdown of self-incompatibility in Physalis acutifolia (Solanaceae).

Authors:  Chelsea Pretz; Stacey D Smith
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.276

6.  Pollinator loss causes rapid adaptive evolution of selfing and dramatically reduces genome-wide genetic variability.

Authors:  Jeremiah W Busch; Sarah Bodbyl-Roels; Sharif Tusuubira; John K Kelly
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 4.171

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.