Literature DB >> 24384941

Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis.

Stefan Kinkel1, Marc N Thomsen, Jan Nadorf, Christian Heisel, Michael C Tanner, Eike Jakubowitz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In total hip arthroplasty fixation of revision stems can be demanding due to femoral bone loss. Strut grafts are often used for bone augmentation and stabilization of the newly inserted prosthesis. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of strut grafts on primary stability under various stem fixation conditions.
METHODS: Two different revision stems (cylindrical and conical shape) were implanted into synthetic femora. Following a semicircular transfemoral osteotomy, three deficient femoral bearings were simulated (bony lid reattached with cable wires; weakened lid reattached with cable wires; strut grafts placed to the weakened lid with cable wires). Relative micro-movements were measured between prostheses and bones due to an axial moment applied to the stems.
RESULTS: Relative movements correlated to the stem shape. The cylindrical stem showed higher movements increasing significantly with a weakened bony lid and portrayed a slight decrease of movements with strut graft application. No unequivocal influence of the weakened lid could be detected for the conical implant. Strut graft application did not show an additional stabilizing effect.
CONCLUSIONS: The primary stability of the cylindrical fixation concept decreases with impaired fixation conditions of the femur. A clear restabilizing effect with strut grafts could not be proven. A decrease of primary stability due to the impaired bone could not be observed for the conical stem shape. Additionally, strut grafts do not enhance fixation for this stem shape. We conclude that surgeons should not rely on a stabilizing effect of strut grafts in revision hip surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24384941      PMCID: PMC4037517          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2257-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  25 in total

1.  Fixation with a modular stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J V Bono; J C McCarthy; J Lee; R J Carangelo; R H Turner
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2000

2.  Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Barden; J G Fitzek; C Huttegger; F Löer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Spatial micromovements of uncemented femoral components after torsional loads.

Authors:  W Görtz; U V Nägerl; H Nägerl; M Thomsen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  The role of allografts in revision arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  Allan E Gross; Hugh Blackley; Paul Wong; Khal Saleh; Ian Woodgate
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2002

5.  [The cement-free modular revision prosthesis MRP-hip revision stem prosthesis in clinical follow-up].

Authors:  T Mumme; R Müller-Rath; M Weisskopf; S Andereya; M Neuss; D C Wirtz
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2004 May-Jun

6.  Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results.

Authors:  C A Engh; J D Bobyn; A H Glassman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-01

7.  Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants.

Authors:  R M Pilliar; J M Lee; C Maniatopoulos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Influence of a functional dynamic loading on bone ingrowth into surface pores of orthopedic implants.

Authors:  P Ducheyne; P De Meester; E Aernoudt
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1977-11

9.  Results of onlay allografts.

Authors:  W C Head; T I Malinin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Alexander Schuh; Stefanie Werber; Ulrich Holzwarth; Günther Zeiler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  5 in total

1.  Fixation pattern of conical and cylindrical modular revision hip stems in different size bone defects.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Marc N Thomsen; Christian Heisel; Alexander Jahnke; Jan P Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Bone stock in revision femoral arthroplasty: a new evaluation.

Authors:  François Canovas; Julien Girard; Olivier Roche; Henri Migaud; François Bonnomet; Mathias Goldschild; Pierre Le Béguec
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Supercharging irradiated allografts with mesenchymal stem cells improves acetabular bone grafting in revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Jacques Pariat; Steffen Queinnec; Yasuhiro Homma; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette; Nathalie Chevallier; Helene Rouard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Allografts supercharged with bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells possess equivalent osteogenic capacity to that of autograft: a study with long-term follow-ups of human biopsies.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Arnaud Dubory; François Roubineau; Yasuhiro Homma; Charles Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette; Nathalie Chevallier; Helene Rouard
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Strut Onlay Allograft in Revision Arthroplasty: Osseous Union and Clinical Outcome.

Authors:  Dietmar Dammerer; Alexander Wurm; Clemens Frischhut; Johannes Petersen; Miar Ouaret; Michael Liebensteiner
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.