Literature DB >> 8113941

Low intensity ultrasound treatment increases strength in a rat femoral fracture model.

S J Wang1, D G Lewallen, M E Bolander, E Y Chao, D M Ilstrup, J F Greenleaf.   

Abstract

Bilateral closed femoral shaft fractures were made in 22 male Long-Evans rats. In 16 animals, ultrasound was applied to one limb for 15 minutes daily 10 times within the first 14 postoperative days. The treated limbs received a 200 microseconds burst of 1.5 or 0.5 MHz sine waves repeated at 1.0 kHz at a spatial average and temporal average intensity of 30 mW/cm2. The contralateral limb of each animal served as a nontreated control. Six remaining animals with fractures and six additional animals without fractures received sham ultrasound treatment to control for the effects of anesthesia and handling. Fracture repair was evaluated on postoperative day 21 by radiography, mechanical testing in torsion, and histology. Five of 16 ultrasound-treated fractures showed obliteration of the fracture gap on radiographs, whereas none of the 28 controls did. The average maximum torque of fractures treated with either signal was 22% greater than that of the contralateral controls (p < 0.05). The stiffness of treated fractures was greater than that of control fractures, but the difference was significant only in animals treated with the 1.5 MHz signal (p < 0.02). Sham treatment did not affect repair in the control group. These results indicate that low-intensity pulsed ultrasound at either 0.5 or 1.5 MHz can accelerate fracture repair at 21 days in this highly controlled model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8113941     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100120106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  37 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Ultrasound treatment of nonunion of the hook of the hamate in sports activities.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Fujioka; Juichi Tanaka; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masaya Tsunoda; Kenji Fujita; Nobuzo Matsui; Takeshi Makino; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms.

Authors:  William D O'Brien
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 7.  Ultrasound and shockwave therapy for acute fractures in adults.

Authors:  Xavier L Griffin; Nick Parsons; Matthew L Costa; David Metcalfe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-06-23

8.  Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on dental implant osseointegration: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Yakup Ustun; Ozgur Erdogan; Mehmet Kurkcu; Tolga Akova; Ibrahim Damlar
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-10

9.  Management of a tibial periprosthetic fracture following revision knee arthroplasty using a pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation device: a case report.

Authors:  Ashtin Doorgakant; Mohammed A Bhutta; Hans Marynissen
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-08-05

10.  Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound: Nonunions.

Authors:  Bernadetta G Dijkman; Sheila Sprague; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.