Literature DB >> 16934858

Ultrasound-biophysics mechanisms.

William D O'Brien1.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic biophysics is the study of mechanisms responsible for how ultrasound and biological materials interact. Ultrasound-induced bioeffect or risk studies focus on issues related to the effects of ultrasound on biological materials. On the other hand, when biological materials affect the ultrasonic wave, this can be viewed as the basis for diagnostic ultrasound. Thus, an understanding of the interaction of ultrasound with tissue provides the scientific basis for image production and risk assessment. Relative to the bioeffect or risk studies, that is, the biophysical mechanisms by which ultrasound affects biological materials, ultrasound-induced bioeffects are generally separated into thermal and non-thermal mechanisms. Ultrasonic dosimetry is concerned with the quantitative determination of ultrasonic energy interaction with biological materials. Whenever ultrasonic energy is propagated into an attenuating material such as tissue, the amplitude of the wave decreases with distance. This attenuation is due to either absorption or scattering. Absorption is a mechanism that represents that portion of ultrasonic wave that is converted into heat, and scattering can be thought of as that portion of the wave, which changes direction. Because the medium can absorb energy to produce heat, a temperature rise may occur as long as the rate of heat production is greater than the rate of heat removal. Current interest with thermally mediated ultrasound-induced bioeffects has focused on the thermal isoeffect concept. The non-thermal mechanism that has received the most attention is acoustically generated cavitation wherein ultrasonic energy by cavitation bubbles is concentrated. Acoustic cavitation, in a broad sense, refers to ultrasonically induced bubble activity occurring in a biological material that contains pre-existing gaseous inclusions. Cavitation-related mechanisms include radiation force, microstreaming, shock waves, free radicals, microjets and strain. It is more challenging to deduce the causes of mechanical effects in tissues that do not contain gas bodies. These ultrasonic biophysics mechanisms will be discussed in the context of diagnostic ultrasound exposure risk concerns.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16934858      PMCID: PMC1995002          DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  157 in total

1.  Sound scattering and localized heat deposition of pulse-driven microbubbles

Authors: 
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Study of laser ablation in the in vivo rabbit brain with MR thermometry.

Authors:  Lili Chen; Janaka P Wansapura; Gary Heit; Kim Butts
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  The effects of the microbubble suspension SH U 454 (Echovist) on ultrasound-induced cell lysis in a rotating tube exposure system.

Authors:  A R Williams; G Kubowicz; E Cramer; R Schlief
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 1.724

Review 4.  Incorporation of macromolecules into living cells.

Authors:  P L Mcneil
Journal:  Methods Cell Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.441

5.  Time-temperature analysis of cell killing of BHK cells heated at temperatures in the range of 43.5 degrees C to 57.0 degrees C.

Authors:  M J Borrelli; L L Thompson; C A Cain; W C Dewey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Ultrasonic absorbed dose, dose rate, and produced lesion volume.

Authors:  R L Johnston; F Dunn
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.890

7.  Thresholds for ultrasonically induced lung hemorrhage in neonatal swine.

Authors:  R Baggs; D P Penney; C Cox; S Z Child; C H Raeman; D Dalecki; E L Carstensen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Exposure-time dependence of the threshold for ultrasonically induced murine lung hemorrhage.

Authors:  C H Raeman; S Z Child; D Dalecki; C Cox; E L Carstensen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Medical ultrasonics: an historical review.

Authors:  C R Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  The use of sonication for the efficient delivery of plasmid DNA into cells.

Authors:  J A Wyber; J Andrews; A D'Emanuele
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  141 in total

1.  Acoustic radiation force-based elasticity imaging methods.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound increases penetration and therapeutic efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in murine xenograft tumors.

Authors:  Shutao Wang; In Soo Shin; Hilary Hancock; Beom-su Jang; Hyung-sub Kim; Sang Myung Lee; Vesna Zderic; Victor Frenkel; Ira Pastan; Chang H Paik; Matthew R Dreher
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Determination of postexcitation thresholds for single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles using double passive cavitation detection.

Authors:  Daniel A King; Michael J Malloy; Alayna C Roberts; Alexander Haak; Christian C Yoder; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of shear stress cultivation on cell membrane disruption and intracellular calcium concentration in sonoporation of endothelial cells.

Authors:  Juyoung Park; Zhenzhen Fan; Cheri X Deng
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Thermal safety of ultrasound-enhanced ocular drug delivery: A modeling study.

Authors:  Marjan Nabili; Craig Geist; Vesna Zderic
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  MR-acoustic radiation force imaging (MR-ARFI) and susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) to visualize calcifications in ex vivo swine brain.

Authors:  Rachel R Bitton; Kim R Butts Pauly
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Intramembrane cavitation as a unifying mechanism for ultrasound-induced bioeffects.

Authors:  Boris Krasovitski; Victor Frenkel; Shy Shoham; Eitan Kimmel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound.

Authors:  Yusuf Tufail; Anna Yoshihiro; Sandipan Pati; Monica M Li; William J Tyler
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Transthoracic cardiac ultrasonic stimulation induces a negative chronotropic effect.

Authors:  Elaine B Buiochi; Rita J Miller; Emily Hartman; Flavio Buiochi; Rosana A Bassani; Eduardo T Costa; William D O'Brien
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  On the feasibility of imaging peripheral nerves using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging.

Authors:  Mark L Palmeri; Jeremy J Dahl; David B MacLeod; Stuart A Grant; Kathryn R Nightingale
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.578

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.