Literature DB >> 15803333

[Health status and health-related quality of life. A facet in the evaluation of outcomes in orthopaedic surgery].

A Roposch1.   

Abstract

Traditional methods for evaluating the outcome of treatment in orthopaedic surgery include the assessment of clinical status, pain and radiography. For more than two decades, there has been an increasing interest in the use of health-status measures in clinical medicine. Outcome evaluation should not only consider clinical and radiographic parameters but also the patients' personal views on their health status and quality of life. Questionnaires developed from basic principles allow the measurement of these views objectively, as well as the comparison of data between groups. The current paper primarily addresses the orthopaedic surgeon and provides a review of quality of life and health-status measures commonly used in orthopaedic outcome studies. Generic and disease specific measures of health status can be used in orthopaedic surgery to complement an outcome assessment. Thereby, the personal view of the patient becomes an objective part of the evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15803333     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-005-0781-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  13 in total

1.  [Investigation of the health-related quality of life after a dorso ventral stabilization of the thoracolumbar junction].

Authors:  D Briem; W Linhart; W Lehmann; M Bullinger; V Schoder; N M Meenen; J Windolf; J M Rueger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Arthroscopic menisectomy in older patients: assessing health-related quality of life].

Authors:  A Roposch; G Brunner; K D Schatz; R Kotz; C Wurnig
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct

Review 3.  Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life.

Authors:  D L Patrick; R A Deyo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The biopsychosocial model of general practice: rhetoric or reality?

Authors:  C Dowrick; C May; M Richardson; P Bundred
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 6.  Standards for validating health measures: definition and content.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

7.  The patient-specific index: asking patients what they want.

Authors:  J G Wright; N L Young
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Differences between patients' and physicians' evaluations of outcome after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J R Lieberman; F Dorey; P Shekelle; L Schumacher; B J Thomas; D J Kilgus; G A Finerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Ask patients what they want. Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement.

Authors:  J G Wright; S Rudicel; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-03

10.  [Outcome quality of treatment for chronic low back pain under primary care conditions].

Authors:  E Lang; R Eisele; H Jankowsky; S Kastner; K Liebig; P Martus; B Neundörfer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.