Literature DB >> 19263533

Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the wheelchair outcome measure.

William B Mortenson1, William C Miller, Jan Miller-Pogar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Provision of a wheelchair has immediate intuitive benefits; however, it can be difficult to evaluate which wheelchair and seating components best meet an individual's needs. As well, funding agencies now prefer evidence of outcomes; and therefore measurement upon prescription of a wheelchair or its components is essential to demonstrate the efficacy of intervention. As no existing tool can provide individualized goal-oriented measure of outcome after wheelchair prescription, a research project was undertaken to create the Wheelchair Outcome Measure (WhOM).
METHOD: A mixed methods research design was employed to develop the instrument, which used in-depth interviews of prescribers, individuals who use wheelchairs and their associates, supplemented by additional questions in which participant preferences in key areas of the measure were quantified.
RESULTS: The WhOM is a client-specific wheelchair intervention measurement tool that is based on the World Health Organization's International Classification of Function, Disability, and Health. It identifies desired outcomes at a participation level and also acknowledges concerns about body structure and function.
CONCLUSION: The new outcome instrument will allow clients to identify and evaluate the outcomes they wish to achieve with their wheelchairs and seating and provide clinicians a way to quantify outcomes of their interventions in a way that is meaningful to the client and potential funding sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 19263533      PMCID: PMC3614518          DOI: 10.1080/17483100701475863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol        ISSN: 1748-3107


  30 in total

1.  Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) instrument.

Authors:  T Mills; M B Holm; E Trefler; M Schmeler; S Fitzgerald; M Boninger
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002 Jan 10-Feb 15       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 2.  Wheelchair skills tests: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olga J E Kilkens; Marcel W M Post; Annet J Dallmeijer; Henk A M Seelen; Lucas H V van der Woude
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.477

3.  Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST).

Authors:  L Demers; R Weiss-Lambrou; B Ska
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  1996

Review 4.  Re-engineering of health care: opportunity or threat for occupational therapists?

Authors:  M Gage
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 1.614

Review 5.  Rehabilitation care and outcomes from the patient's perspective.

Authors:  A M Kramer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Changes in the quality of life in severely disabled people following provision of powered indoor/outdoor chairs.

Authors:  A Davies; L H De Souza; A O Frank
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2003-03-18       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 7.  Upper extremity assistive devices: assessment of use by spinal cord-injured patients with quadriplegia.

Authors:  S L Garber; T L Gregorio
Journal:  Am J Occup Ther       Date:  1990-02

8.  Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure.

Authors:  M A McColl; M Paterson; D Davies; L Doubt; M Law
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.614

9.  The effect of an outdoor powered wheelchair on activity and participation in users with stroke.

Authors:  Ingvor Pettersson; Kristina Törnquist; Gerd Ahlström
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2006-09

10.  Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation.

Authors:  Ase Brandt; Susanne Iwarsson; Agneta Ståhle
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  13 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of the telephone administration of the wheelchair outcome measure (WhOM) for middle-aged and older users of power mobility devices.

Authors:  Claudine Auger; Louise Demers; Isabelle Gélinas; François Routhier; W Ben Mortenson; William C Miller
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 2.  Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review.

Authors:  William B Mortenson; William C Miller; Claudine Auger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Measuring wheelchair confidence among power wheelchair users: an adaptation of the WheelCon-M using focus groups and a think aloud process.

Authors:  Paula W Rushton; Emma Smith; William C Miller; Kristine Vaughan
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2015-06-30

4.  Development, construction, and content validation of a questionnaire to test mobile shower commode usability.

Authors:  Emma L Friesen; Deborah G Theodoros; Trevor G Russell
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015

5.  Validating the wheelchair outcome measure for residents in long-term care.

Authors:  Shahriar Parvaneh; William B Mortenson; William C Miller
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2013-04-23

6.  Exploratory Validation of a Multidimensional Power Wheelchair Outcomes Toolkit.

Authors:  W Ben Mortenson; Louise Demers; Paula W Rushton; Claudine Auger; Francois Routhier; William C Miller
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Evidence-Based Strategies for Preserving Mobility for Elderly and Aging Manual Wheelchair Users.

Authors:  Philip S Requejo; Jan Furumasu; Sara J Mulroy
Journal:  Top Geriatr Rehabil       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  A participatory approach to develop the Power Mobility Screening Tool and the Power Mobility Clinical Driving Assessment tool.

Authors:  Deepan C Kamaraj; Brad E Dicianno; Rory A Cooper
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Discriminatory validity of the Aspects of Wheelchair Mobility Test as demonstrated by a comparison of four wheelchair types designed for use in low-resource areas.

Authors:  Karen L Rispin; Elisa Hamm; Joy Wee
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2017-09-08

10.  Feasibility of a Systematic, Comprehensive, One-to-One Training (SCOOT) program for new scooter users: study protocol for a randomized control trial.

Authors:  W Ben Mortenson; Sharon Jang; Charlie H Goldsmith; Laura Hurd Clarke; Sandra Hobson; Richelle Emery
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.