Literature DB >> 8109999

What is the role of the distraction test of hearing?

A Mott1, A Emond.   

Abstract

The use of the distraction test as a screen for hearing loss in infancy was reviewed in the Bristol and District Health Authority. Inaccuracies in data recording were found which challenged the screening and referral rates produced by the National Child Health Computer. Representative samples of children failing the distraction test and children needing hearing aids were followed up through the screening process. Of 130 children failing the test, only 46 (35%) had moderate conductive hearing loss and none had a severe loss. Of 34 children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) requiring hearing aids, seven (21%) were identified by the test and five (15%) presented late after having been screened. The distraction test as now used in Bristol identifies large numbers of children with minor hearing loss. The referral of these children to the secondary services leads to delays for those children with more significant loss. The test is no longer the main method for identifying children with SNHL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8109999      PMCID: PMC1029673          DOI: 10.1136/adc.70.1.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  8 in total

1.  Screening infants for hearing loss.

Authors:  J Brown; E Watson; E Alberman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  Hearing impairment in childhood.

Authors:  C S Peckham
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Early identification of hearing loss: screening and surveillance methods.

Authors:  P E Scanlon; J M Bamford
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Screening for sensorineural deafness by health visitors. The Steering Committee, Oxford Region Child Development Project.

Authors:  A Johnson; H Ashurst
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Parental suspicion and identification of hearing impairment.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin; S Laoide
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Value of screening for deafness in the first year of life.

Authors:  R Boothman; N Orr
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Hearing screening by health visitors: a critical appraisal of the distraction test.

Authors:  B McCormick
Journal:  Health Visit       Date:  1983-12

8.  Health surveillance of preschool children: four years' experience.

Authors:  A F Colver
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-05-12
  8 in total
  7 in total

Review 1.  Neonatal screening for hearing impairment.

Authors:  C R Kennedy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Universal hearing screening using transient otoacoustic emissions in a community health clinic.

Authors:  H M Bantock; S Croxson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Neonatal hearing screening.

Authors:  A M Oudesluys-Murphy; H L van Straaten; R Bholasingh; G A van Zanten
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  The costs of early hearing screening in England and Wales.

Authors:  J C Stevens; D M Hall; A Davis; C M Davies; S Dixon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Late diagnosis of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment: why are detection methods failing?

Authors:  C Robertson; S Aldridge; F Jarman; K Saunders; Z Poulakis; F Oberklaid
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Screening for hearing loss versus parental concern regarding hearing problems: Subsequent referral and treatment for otitis media in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Willeke Lok; Lucien J C Anteunis; Michelene N Chenault; Cor Meesters; Mark P Haggard
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 2.581

7.  Risk factors for failing the hearing screen due to otitis media in Dutch infants.

Authors:  Willeke Lok; Lucien J C Anteunis; Cor Meesters; Michelene N Chenault; Mark P Haggard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.503

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.