Literature DB >> 2400220

Screening for sensorineural deafness by health visitors. The Steering Committee, Oxford Region Child Development Project.

A Johnson1, H Ashurst.   

Abstract

Screening for hearing loss in the first year of life, using the distraction test, remains the responsibility of health visitors in most health districts in the United Kingdom. We have evaluated the screening procedure used routinely in one health region in a population of infants at increased risk of sensorineural deafness. They were infants who weighed less than 2000 g at birth or infants who weighed 2000 g or more at birth and who spent more than 24 hours in a special care nursery. The infants' responses to a distraction test were recorded by health visitors and sent to the project office. The results were compared with information from a regional register of early childhood impairment that included children in whom sensorineural deafness had been diagnosed before the age of 3 years. The register had been compiled using information from a wide range of sources. When used in this high risk population the distraction test was sensitive (91%), but nonspecific (82%). The effectiveness of the screening programme was limited, however, because there was an increased risk of deafness among infants who missed being screened by health visitors. In addition, 71% of the deaf infants on the register were not in the high risk population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2400220      PMCID: PMC1792464          DOI: 10.1136/adc.65.8.841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  20 in total

1.  Screening infants for hearing loss.

Authors:  J Brown; E Watson; E Alberman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Screening for hearing loss in childhood: a study of national practice.

Authors:  S Stewart-Brown; M N Haslum
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-05-30

3.  Four factors that accurately predict hearing loss in "high risk" neonates.

Authors:  J Halpern; H Hosford-Dunn; N Malachowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Child health clincs and inverse care laws: evidence from longitudinal study of 1878 pre-school children.

Authors:  P M Zinkin; C A Cox
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-08-14

5.  Obtaining parental consent--opting in or opting out?

Authors:  L Mutch; R King
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Feasibility of screening all neonates for hearing loss.

Authors:  D M Hall; J Garner
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening.

Authors:  P Bray; D Kemp
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1987-08

Review 8.  A regional register of early childhood impairments: a discussion paper. The Steering Committee of the Oxford Region Child Development Project.

Authors:  A Johnson; R King
Journal:  Community Med       Date:  1989-11

9.  Age at fitting of hearing aids and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  A Markides
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1986-05

10.  Hearing disorders in childhood, some procedures for detection, identification and diagnostic evaluation.

Authors:  A Parving
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 1.675

View more
  4 in total

1.  Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn.

Authors:  C R Kennedy; L Kimm; D C Dees; P I Evans; M Hunter; S Lenton; R D Thornton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Prevalence, aetiology, and care of severe and profound hearing loss.

Authors:  M F Baille; C Arnaud; C Cans; H Grandjean; C du Mazaubrun; C Rumeau-Rouquette
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  What is the role of the distraction test of hearing?

Authors:  A Mott; A Emond
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Late diagnosis of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment: why are detection methods failing?

Authors:  C Robertson; S Aldridge; F Jarman; K Saunders; Z Poulakis; F Oberklaid
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.791

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.