Literature DB >> 2357083

Early identification of hearing loss: screening and surveillance methods.

P E Scanlon1, J M Bamford.   

Abstract

Service monitoring data on the outcomes of health visitors' screening for hearing loss at 8 months in West Berkshire indicate low sensitivity and low positive predictive value, despite efforts to improve the conduct of the screen. Nevertheless, data on a recent series of severely hearing impaired children indicate significantly earlier diagnosis than previously, due in part in the introduction of other service changes including neonatal 'at risk' screening and surveillance using parental observation. For a trial period the traditional screening method for the detection of hearing loss in babies will be discontinued and effort concentrated on these alternative procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2357083      PMCID: PMC1792141          DOI: 10.1136/adc.65.5.479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  6 in total

1.  Stimulus complexity, state and infants' auditory behavioural responses.

Authors:  J Bench; L Mentz
Journal:  Br J Disord Commun       Date:  1975-04

2.  Trials with the auditory response cradle. 1--Neonatal responses to auditory stimuli.

Authors:  M J Bennett
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-11

3.  Childhood deafness in the European community.

Authors:  J A Martin; O Bentzen; J R Colley; D Hennebert; C Holm; S Iurato; G A de Jonge; O McCullen; M L Meyer; W J Moore; A Morgon
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1981

4.  Hearing screening by health visitors: a critical appraisal of the distraction test.

Authors:  B McCormick
Journal:  Health Visit       Date:  1983-12

5.  Analysis of records from an open-access audiology service.

Authors:  B McCormick; S A Wood; Y Cope; F M Spavins
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1984-08

6.  Age at fitting of hearing aids and speech intelligibility.

Authors:  A Markides
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1986-05
  6 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  Hearing screening in children--state of the art(s)

Authors:  M P Haggard
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Early identification of hearing loss: screening and surveillance methods.

Authors:  M J Bannon; Y H Carter
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses in the newborn.

Authors:  C R Kennedy; L Kimm; D C Dees; P I Evans; M Hunter; S Lenton; R D Thornton
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Six year effectiveness of a population based two tier infant hearing screening programme.

Authors:  S A Russ; F Rickards; Z Poulakis; M Barker; K Saunders; M Wake
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  The costs of early hearing screening in England and Wales.

Authors:  J C Stevens; D M Hall; A Davis; C M Davies; S Dixon
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  What is the role of the distraction test of hearing?

Authors:  A Mott; A Emond
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Late diagnosis of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment: why are detection methods failing?

Authors:  C Robertson; S Aldridge; F Jarman; K Saunders; Z Poulakis; F Oberklaid
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Neonatal at risk screening and the identification of deafness.

Authors:  P M Watkin; M Baldwin; G McEnery
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.791

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.