Literature DB >> 8091778

Anastomosis.

R Bardini1, M Asolati, A Ruol, L Bonavina, S Baseggio, A Peracchia.   

Abstract

Esophageal anastomosis is still associated with a high rate of complications even though they have decreased considerably in recent years. Anastomotic leaks are more frequent in the neck than in the chest, and related mortality rate is not different. The leakage incidence does not depend on suture materials or on technical modalities used to perform the anastomosis. In fact, there is no difference between the leakage rate when comparing manual and mechanical anastomoses. The leak incidence after both mechanical and manual anastomoses is much higher in collective reviews than in reports coming from leading centers. "Frequent" esophageal surgeons can learn from their previous experience and therefore avoid technical errors, whereas "causal" esophageal surgeons do not have this opportunity. Performing an esophageal anastomosis is a technical matter, and suture healing is independent of the patient's biologic situation. Anastomotic fibrotic strictures are frequent after both manual and mechanical anastomoses, and most can be avoided by meticulous suturing technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8091778     DOI: 10.1007/bf00316817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  37 in total

1.  Technique for isoperistaltic gastric tube for esophageal bypass.

Authors:  R W Postlethwait
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Resection and reconstruction of the esophagus.

Authors:  G B Ong
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 3.  Stapled esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  R A Hopkins; J C Alexander; R W Postlethwait
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Surgery for carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  H Akiyama
Journal:  Curr Probl Surg       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Surgical treatment of cervical anastomotic leaks following esophageal reconstruction.

Authors:  R Bardini; L Bonavina; M Asolati; S Narne; A Peracchia
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  1987 Jul-Sep

6.  Problems in esophageal bypass for unresectable carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.

Authors:  K Sugimachi; H Ueo; H Kai; Y Okudaira; K Inokuchi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Transthoracic esophagectomy: a safe approach to carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  D J Mathisen; H C Grillo; E W Wilkins; A C Moncure; A D Hilgenberg
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture.

Authors:  J Wong; H Cheung; R Lui; Y W Fan; A Smith; K F Siu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Substernal gastric bypass for palliation of esophageal carcinoma: rationale and technique.

Authors:  J C Robinson; S S Isa; E K Spees; E L Rogers; T R Gadacz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Esophagogastrectomy. A safe, widely applicable, and expeditious form of palliation for patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia.

Authors:  F H Ellis; S P Gibb; E Watkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis and definition of anastomotic leakage from the radiologist's perspective].

Authors:  B D Bundy; H-U Kauczor; L Grenacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Randomized comparative trial of a novel one-step needle sphincterotome versus direct incision and balloon dilation used to create gastrotomies for natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in the porcine model.

Authors:  Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh; Philip Wai Yan Chiu; James Yun Wong Lau; Enders Kwok Wai Ng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Surgery for esophageal and cardia cancer in Hungary: a nationwide retrospective five-year survey.

Authors:  J Faller
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Postoperative complications do not affect long-term outcome in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Kirsten Lindner; Mathias Fritz; Christina Haane; Norbert Senninger; Daniel Palmes; Richard Hummel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Predictive value of blood flow in the gastric tube in anastomotic insufficiency after thoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Tatsuya Miyazaki; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Hiroyuki Kato; Minako Yoshikawa; Hitoshi Ojima; Katsuhiko Tsukada
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Role of the surgical trainee in upper gastrointestinal resectional surgery.

Authors:  A M Paisley; K K Madhavan; S Paterson-Brown; R K Praseedom; O J Garden
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  A double stapled technique for oesophago-enteric anastomosis.

Authors:  A Kotru; A-K John; E-P Dewar
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Prospective trial comparing contrast swallow, computed tomography and endoscopy to identify anastomotic leak following oesophagogastric surgery.

Authors:  Brian A Hogan; Desmond C Winter; Desmond Winter; David Broe; Patrick Broe; Michael J Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Clinical application of layered anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Zi-Jiang Zhu; Yong-Fan Zhao; Long-Qi Chen; Yang Hu; Lun-Xu Liu; Yun Wang; Ying-Li Kou
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  The effects of vasopressors on perfusion of gastric graft after esophagectomy. An experimental study.

Authors:  Dimitrios Theodorou; Panagiotis G Drimousis; Andreas Larentzakis; Apostolos Papalois; Konstantinos G Toutouzas; Stylianos Katsaragakis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.