Literature DB >> 3563886

Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture.

J Wong, H Cheung, R Lui, Y W Fan, A Smith, K F Siu.   

Abstract

The circular stapler has lowered the leakage rate of an esophageal anastomosis to a level hitherto achieved by only a few surgeons performing hand anastomosis on selected patients with carcinoma of the esophagus. However, the esophageal anastomosis performed with a stapler is also associated with a high stricture rate. Our prospective study was conducted to determine the leakage rate and the incidence of stricture after esophagogastric anastomosis was performed with a stapler, the relationship of stricture to the size of the stapler, and the risk of stricture in relation to time. In a group of 174 patients with carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus, resection was performed, and a one-stage esophagogastric anastomosis was constructed. There were 33 hand anastomoses, 64 anastomoses with an EEA stapler (U.S. Surgical Corp., Norwalk, Conn.), and 77 anastomoses with an ILS stapler (Ethicon Ltd., Edinburgh, U.K.). The anastomotic leakage rate was 3.4% (6/174); 3% with the hand technique and 3.5% with the stapler technique (4.7% for the EEA and 2.6% for the ILS). After leakages and hospital deaths were excluded, 133 discharged patients were evaluated for the occurrence of anastomotic strictures. Only those who complained of dysphagia were investigated. The incidence of stricture for hand anastomosis was 8.7%-EEA 20% and ILS 10%; the overall incidence of anastomoses with a stapler was 14.5%. The true incidence would probably be higher if all patients were assessed by endoscopic or radiologic examination after operation. All three sizes of EEA staplers had a high incidence of stricture. For the ILS stapler the 25 mm size had the highest stricture rate (28.6%) of all groups, but for the 29 and 33 mm sizes, the incidences were 5.3% and 0%, respectively. Actuarial analysis showed an increasing risk of stricture with a reduction in the size of stapler used and was 32.5% and 35%, respectively, for the ILS 25 mm and EEA 25 mm staplers at 131/2 months. The risk of stricture occurrence was highest in the first 4 months. Treatment by bougienage was satisfactory. In conclusion, esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler is a very safe procedure with respect to leakage but is associated with a high risk of stricture, except when the largest ILS staplers are used. However, dilatation readily overcomes the stricture occurrence and adequately compensates for the reduced leakage rate and its attendant serious consequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3563886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  37 in total

1.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Satoshi Ono; Risa Takahata; Shuichi Hiraki; Yoshihisa Yaguchi; Isao Kumano; Yusuke Matsumoto; Kazumichi Yoshida; Satoshi Aiko; Takashi Ichikura; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  [Using a surgical stapler on the gastrointestinal tract--pro and contra].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; J R Siewert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1992

3.  Balloon dilatation for anastomotic stricture after upper gastro-intestinal surgery.

Authors:  M Inagake; T Yamane; Y Kitao; J Okuzumi; K Kuwata; T Yamaguchi; K Oya; K Sawai; O Kojima; T Takahashi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Prevention of anastomotic stricture with a purse-string suture technique on the gastric side during esophageal carcinoma operations: retrospective study of 463 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Chong Zhang; Min-Hua Yao; Tao Jin; Li Sun; Jian Hu; Yu-Xin Zha
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Experience with a transnasally fixed endoprosthesis for treating esophageal anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  M Brückner; H Grimm; V C Nam; N Soehendra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Mid-term outcomes of side-to-side stapled anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Won-Min Jo; Jae Seung Shin; In Sung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Laparoscopic esophagogastric circular stapled anastomosis: a modified technique to protect the esophagus.

Authors:  Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Souya Nunobe; Masanori Tokunaga; Shigekazu Ohyama; Yasuyuki Seto; Tetsuichiro Muto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 8.  Hand-sewn versus stapled oesophago-gastric anastomosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Soumil Vyas; Majid Hashemi; Mark Winslet
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.

Authors:  Wen-Ping Wang; Qiang Gao; Kang-Ning Wang; Hui Shi; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  iTriangular Stapling Technique: A Novel Reconstruction Method and Clinical Outcomes of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis after Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kazunori Shibao; Yuzuru Inoue; Yusuke Sawatsubashi; Siro Kohi; Nobutaka Matayoshi; Takayuki Tanoue; Nagahiro Sato; Takefumi Katsuki; Keiji Hirata
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.