Literature DB >> 18210181

Clinical application of layered anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy.

Zi-Jiang Zhu1, Yong-Fan Zhao, Long-Qi Chen, Yang Hu, Lun-Xu Liu, Yun Wang, Ying-Li Kou.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the operative results in regard to reducing anastomotic leakage and stricture formation using a newly designed layered manual esophagogastric anastomosis versus a stapler esophagogastrostomy versus the conventional hand-sewn whole-layer anastomosis after resection for esophageal or gastric cardiac carcinoma. From January 2004 to September 2006, a total of 1024 patients with esophageal or gastric cardia carcinoma underwent a layered esophagogastric anastomosis with the assistance of a three-leaf clipper in a single university medical center. The mucosal layers of the esophagus and stomach were sutured continuously with 4/0 Vicryl plus antibacterial suture (polyglyconate). From May 2002 to December 2003, there were also 170 patients and 69 patients who underwent stapler and conventional whole-layer anastomosis, respectively; they served as control groups. The results were analyzed retrospectively. The operative mortality rate was 0.7% in the layered group compared to 5.9% and 7.2% for the stapler group and the whole-layer group (p < 0.01), The anastomotic leakage rates were 0%, 3.5%, and 5.8% for the layered group, stapler group, and whole-layer group, respectively (p < 0.01). All patients were followed postoperatively. Six patients in the layered group (0.6%) developed mild stricture formation compared to 16 patients in stapled group (9.9%) and 5 patients in the conventional whole-layer group (7.8%) (p < 0.01). The application of layered esophagogastric anastomosis could reduce the incidence of anastomotic leakage and stricture after esophagectomy compared with the stapler and whole-layer manual anastomoses. It is easy to apply and could be used as an alternative for esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for esophageal or cardiac carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18210181     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-007-9396-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  18 in total

1.  Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Increased chemiluminescence and ulcer development in the low blood flow state of the gastric tube for esophageal replacement.

Authors:  S Aiko; N Ando; Y Shinozawa; S Ozawa; M Kitajima; I Kurose; M Tsuchiya
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Impaired healing of cervical oesophagogastrostomies can be predicted by estimation of gastric serosal blood perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetry.

Authors:  J P Pierie; P W De Graaf; H Poen; I Van der Tweel; H Obertop
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1994-11

Review 5.  Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  John D Mitchell
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.750

6.  Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Sina Ercan; Thomas W Rice; Sudish C Murthy; Lisa A Rybicki; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Comparison of manual and mechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Hsao-Hsun Hsu; Jin-Shing Chen; Pei-Ming Huang; Jang-Ming Lee; Yung-Chie Lee
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Esophagogastric anastomosis performed with a stapler: the occurrence of leakage and stricture.

Authors:  J Wong; H Cheung; R Lui; Y W Fan; A Smith; K F Siu
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Single-layered cervical esophageal anastomoses: a prospective study of two suturing techniques.

Authors:  R Bardini; L Bonavina; M Asolati; A Ruol; C Castoro; E Tiso
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Stapler design and strictures at the esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  R G Berrisford; R D Page; R J Donnelly
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  13 in total

1.  Clinical application of mucosal valve technique for anastomosis during esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Bin Li; Yu-Min Li; Jian-Hua Zhang; Yun-Feng Su; Cheng Wang; Zhi-Qiang Wang; Yun-Jiu Gou; Tie-Niu Song; Jian-Bao Yang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer.

Authors:  Fanyu Meng; Yin Li; Haibo Ma; Ming Yan; Ruixiang Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.

Authors:  Qi-Rong Xu; Kang-Ning Wang; Wen-Ping Wang; Kun Zhang; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Management of thoracic esophageal perforation.

Authors:  Yidan Lin; Guangliang Jiang; Lunxu Liu; Jack Xiwen Jiang; Longqi Chen; Yongfan Zhao; Junjie Yang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  [Anastomoses in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  K Schwameis; J Zacherl
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  The Role of Esophagogastric Anastomotic Technique in DecreasingBenign Stricture Formation in the Surgery of Esophageal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Mohsen Sokouti; Samad Ej Golzari; Masoud Pezeshkian; Mohammad-Reza Farahnak
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2013-03-14

7.  Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.

Authors:  Yong Yuan; Xiao-Xi Zeng; Yong-Fan Zhao; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.

Authors:  Wen-Ping Wang; Qiang Gao; Kang-Ning Wang; Hui Shi; Long-Qi Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  The triangulating stapling technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yasushi Toh; Yoshihisa Sakaguchi; Osamu Ikeda; Eisuke Adachi; Kippei Ohgaki; Yoichi Yamashita; Eiji Oki; Kazuhito Minami; Takeshi Okamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy.

Authors:  Juntang Guo; Xiangyang Chu; Yang Liu; Naikang Zhou; Yongfu Ma; Chaoyang Liang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.