Literature DB >> 8083119

The influence of young age on outcome in early stage breast cancer.

B L Fowble1, D J Schultz, B Overmoyer, L J Solin, K Fox, L Jardines, S Orel, J H Glick.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of young age on outcome in women with early stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery and radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1981 and 1991, 980 patients with Stage I and II breast cancer underwent excisional biopsy, axillary dissection, and radiation. The median follow-up was 4.6 years, with a range of 1 month to 11 years. The patients were divided into three groups, based on age at the time of diagnosis: (a) age < or = 35 years--64 patients, (b) age 36-50 years--363 patients, and (c) age > 50 years--553 patients. The comparability of the groups was assessed in terms of clinical factors (tumor size and race), histopathologic factors (histologic subtype, final resection margin, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, pathologic nodal status), and treatment related factors (reexcision, median total dose to the primary, region(s) treated with radiation, and the use of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen). Outcome was evaluated for overall, relapse-free, and cause-specific survival and patterns of first failure (breast, regional nodes, and distant metastasis).
RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of race, clinical tumor size, pathology of the primary tumor, pathologic nodal status, final margin of resection, progesterone receptor status, median total dose to the primary tumor, or the regions treated. However, younger women were significantly more likely to have estrogen receptor negative tumors, undergo reexcision, and receive adjuvant systemic chemotherapy without tamoxifen. Younger women were found to have a statistically significantly decreased 8-year actuarial relapse-free survival (53% vs. 67% vs. 74%, p = 0.009), cause-specific survival (73% vs. 84% vs. 90%, p = 0.02), freedom from distant metastasis (76% vs. 75% vs. 83%, p = 0.02), and a significantly increased risk of breast recurrence (24% vs. 14% vs. 12%, p = 0.001), and regional node recurrence (7% vs. 1% vs. 1%, p = 0.0002). The patients were further divided on the basis of their pathologic nodal status. There were no statistically significant differences among the three age groups for axillary node-positive patients for overall survival (75% vs. 80% vs. 74%), relapse-free survival (73% vs. 73% vs. 62%), cause-specific survival (76% vs. 85% vs. 80%), and freedom from distant metastasis (75% vs. 75% vs. 72%), or breast recurrence (0% vs. 9% vs. 6%). The findings were identical when the analysis was restricted to node-positive patients who received chemotherapy. However, for axillary node-negative women, young age was associated with a statistically significant decreased overall survival (71% vs. 83% vs. 92%), relapse-free survival (51% vs. 65% vs. 76%), cause-specific survival (71% vs. 86% vs. 93%), freedom from distant metastasis (77% vs. 76% vs. 88%), and a statistically significant increased risk of breast recurrence (40% vs. 16% vs. 13%), and regional node recurrence (3% vs. 1% vs. 0%). The risk of a breast recurrence in axillary node-negative young women was decreased by the addition of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy but not by the use of reexcision.
CONCLUSIONS: The present analysis demonstrates that young women with early stage breast cancer do significantly worse when compared to older women in terms of relapse-free survival, cause-specific survival, distant metastasis and breast and regional node recurrence. However, the adverse effect of young age on outcome appears to be limited to the node-negative patients. These findings suggest that node-negative early stage breast cancer in young women is a more aggressive disease, with an increased risk for all patterns of failure and a decreased survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8083119     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90515-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  60 in total

1.  Evaluation of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the p53 binding protein 1 (TP53BP1) gene in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation (BCS + RT).

Authors:  Bruce G Haffty; Sharad Goyal; Diptee Kulkarni; Camille Green; Alexi Vazquez; Devora Schiff; Meena S Moran; Qifeng Yang; Shridar Ganesan; Kim M Hirsfield
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Patterns and risk factors of locoregional recurrence in T1-T2 node negative breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy: implications for postmastectomy radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rita Abi-Raad; Rimoun Boutrus; Rui Wang; Andrzej Niemierko; Shannon Macdonald; Barbara Smith; Alphonse G Taghian
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Current perceptions regarding surgical margin status after breast-conserving therapy: results of a survey.

Authors:  Alphonse Taghian; Majid Mohiuddin; Reshma Jagsi; Saveli Goldberg; Elizabeth Ceilley; Simon Powell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics.

Authors:  Csaba Gajdos; Paul Ian Tartter; Ira J Bleiweiss; George Hermann; John de Csepel; Alison Estabrook; Alfred W Rademaker
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Score As You Lift (SAYL): A Statistical Relational Learning Approach to Uplift Modeling.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Finn Kuusisto; Elizabeth S Burnside; David Page; Jude Shavlik; Vítor Santos Costa
Journal:  Mach Learn Knowl Discov Databases       Date:  2013

6.  Qualitative age interactions in breast cancer studies: mind the gap.

Authors:  William F Anderson; Ismail Jatoi; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Effects of screening and systemic adjuvant therapy on ER-specific US breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  Diego Munoz; Aimee M Near; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Sandra J Lee; Clyde B Schechter; Oguzhan Alagoz; Donald A Berry; Elizabeth S Burnside; Yaojen Chang; Gary Chisholm; Harry J de Koning; Mehmet Ali Ergun; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Hui Huang; Natasha K Stout; Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Support Vector Machines for Differential Prediction.

Authors:  Finn Kuusisto; Vitor Santos Costa; Houssam Nassif; Elizabeth Burnside; David Page; Jude Shavlik
Journal:  Mach Learn Knowl Discov Databases       Date:  2014

Review 9.  [Is axillary dissection in clinically lymph node-negative breast carcinoma further indicated?].

Authors:  F K Böhler; H Eiter; W Rhomberg
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Breast cancer in young women: poor survival despite intensive treatment.

Authors:  Hanna Fredholm; Sonja Eaker; Jan Frisell; Lars Holmberg; Irma Fredriksson; Henrik Lindman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.