Literature DB >> 26158123

Support Vector Machines for Differential Prediction.

Finn Kuusisto1, Vitor Santos Costa2, Houssam Nassif3, Elizabeth Burnside, David Page, Jude Shavlik.   

Abstract

Machine learning is continually being applied to a growing set of fields, including the social sciences, business, and medicine. Some fields present problems that are not easily addressed using standard machine learning approaches and, in particular, there is growing interest in differential prediction. In this type of task we are interested in producing a classifier that specifically characterizes a subgroup of interest by maximizing the difference in predictive performance for some outcome between subgroups in a population. We discuss adapting maximum margin classifiers for differential prediction. We first introduce multiple approaches that do not affect the key properties of maximum margin classifiers, but which also do not directly attempt to optimize a standard measure of differential prediction. We next propose a model that directly optimizes a standard measure in this field, the uplift measure. We evaluate our models on real data from two medical applications and show excellent results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  support vector machine; uplift modeling

Year:  2014        PMID: 26158123      PMCID: PMC4492338          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-44851-9_4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mach Learn Knowl Discov Databases


  6 in total

1.  Patterns of bias due to differential misclassification by case-control status in a case-control study.

Authors:  Po-Huang Chyou
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.

Authors:  K M Flegal; P M Keyl; F J Nieto
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Score As You Lift (SAYL): A Statistical Relational Learning Approach to Uplift Modeling.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Finn Kuusisto; Elizabeth S Burnside; David Page; Jude Shavlik; Vítor Santos Costa
Journal:  Mach Learn Knowl Discov Databases       Date:  2013

4.  Is age at diagnosis an independent prognostic factor for survival following breast cancer?

Authors:  Upali W Jayasinghe; Richard Taylor; John Boyages
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Patricia M Kearney; Colin Baigent; Jon Godwin; Heather Halls; Jonathan R Emberson; Carlo Patrono
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-03

6.  The influence of young age on outcome in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  B L Fowble; D J Schultz; B Overmoyer; L J Solin; K Fox; L Jardines; S Orel; J H Glick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-08-30       Impact factor: 7.038

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.