BACKGROUND: In the treatment of breast cancer, the indication for adjuvant systemic treatment was extended also to nodal negative tumor stages in the last years. For that reason, the indicator status of axillary dissection lost some of its importance. Therefore, in node negative patients, the necessity of axillary dissection and the use of definitive axillary radiotherapy, which causes less morbidity, may be reconsidered. METHODS: In a review of the related literature, we present international treatment experiences related to axillary dissection, axillary radiotherapy and "sentinel node dissection" (SLND). In addition, our long-term experiences in 19 patients with clinically negative axillary nodes treated by conservative surgery without axillary dissection but axillary radiotherapy, are reported. RESULTS: The median rate of axillary recurrences with axillary radiotherapy is 2.0%, the regional (supraclavicular and retrosternal) recurrence rate 2.7%. With axillary dissection, axillary recurrences occur in 1 to 2%, in nodal negative stages in 0 to 1%, the median regional recurrence rate is 2.2%. A meta-analysis presented in 1995 by the Early Breast Cancer Study Group showed no significant difference in the regional recurrence rate or the overall survival between axillary dissection and axillary radiotherapy. With SLND, usually only one axillary node is excised. With the help of molecular and immunohistochemical methods, SLND may predict axillary involvement with high precision. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive radiotherapy of the axilla is a valid treatment option for patients without palpable axillary nodes with the potential advantage of being less cost intensive and better tolerated. If the indication for systemic therapy is no more dependent on the axillary status, axillary dissection may be replaced by axillary radiotherapy. In small tumors without risk factors and without indication for systemic therapy, SLND seems to be the best treatment option.
BACKGROUND: In the treatment of breast cancer, the indication for adjuvant systemic treatment was extended also to nodal negative tumor stages in the last years. For that reason, the indicator status of axillary dissection lost some of its importance. Therefore, in node negative patients, the necessity of axillary dissection and the use of definitive axillary radiotherapy, which causes less morbidity, may be reconsidered. METHODS: In a review of the related literature, we present international treatment experiences related to axillary dissection, axillary radiotherapy and "sentinel node dissection" (SLND). In addition, our long-term experiences in 19 patients with clinically negative axillary nodes treated by conservative surgery without axillary dissection but axillary radiotherapy, are reported. RESULTS: The median rate of axillary recurrences with axillary radiotherapy is 2.0%, the regional (supraclavicular and retrosternal) recurrence rate 2.7%. With axillary dissection, axillary recurrences occur in 1 to 2%, in nodal negative stages in 0 to 1%, the median regional recurrence rate is 2.2%. A meta-analysis presented in 1995 by the Early Breast Cancer Study Group showed no significant difference in the regional recurrence rate or the overall survival between axillary dissection and axillary radiotherapy. With SLND, usually only one axillary node is excised. With the help of molecular and immunohistochemical methods, SLND may predict axillary involvement with high precision. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive radiotherapy of the axilla is a valid treatment option for patients without palpable axillary nodes with the potential advantage of being less cost intensive and better tolerated. If the indication for systemic therapy is no more dependent on the axillary status, axillary dissection may be replaced by axillary radiotherapy. In small tumors without risk factors and without indication for systemic therapy, SLND seems to be the best treatment option.
Authors: L J Solin; B L Fowble; D J Schultz; I T Yeh; M J Kowalyshyn; R L Goodman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1990-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: K J Halverson; M E Taylor; C A Perez; D M Garcia; R Myerson; G Philpott; J Levy; J R Simpson; G Tucker; C Rush Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: W P Peters; M Ross; J J Vredenburgh; B Meisenberg; L B Marks; E Winer; J Kurtzberg; R C Bast; R Jones; E Shpall Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1993-06 Impact factor: 44.544