Literature DB >> 26158122

Score As You Lift (SAYL): A Statistical Relational Learning Approach to Uplift Modeling.

Houssam Nassif1, Finn Kuusisto2, Elizabeth S Burnside, David Page, Jude Shavlik, Vítor Santos Costa.   

Abstract

We introduce Score As You Lift (SAYL), a novel Statistical Relational Learning (SRL) algorithm, and apply it to an important task in the diagnosis of breast cancer. SAYL combines SRL with the marketing concept of uplift modeling, uses the area under the uplift curve to direct clause construction and final theory evaluation, integrates rule learning and probability assignment, and conditions the addition of each new theory rule to existing ones. Breast cancer, the most common type of cancer among women, is categorized into two subtypes: an earlier in situ stage where cancer cells are still confined, and a subsequent invasive stage. Currently older women with in situ cancer are treated to prevent cancer progression, regardless of the fact that treatment may generate undesirable side-effects, and the woman may die of other causes. Younger women tend to have more aggressive cancers, while older women tend to have more indolent tumors. Therefore older women whose in situ tumors show significant dissimilarity with in situ cancer in younger women are less likely to progress, and can thus be considered for watchful waiting. Motivated by this important problem, this work makes two main contributions. First, we present the first multi-relational uplift modeling system, and introduce, implement and evaluate a novel method to guide search in an SRL framework. Second, we compare our algorithm to previous approaches, and demonstrate that the system can indeed obtain differential rules of interest to an expert on real data, while significantly improving the data uplift.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 26158122      PMCID: PMC4492311          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40994-3_38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mach Learn Knowl Discov Databases


  9 in total

1.  Nonpalpable breast cancer: mammographic appearance as predictor of histologic type.

Authors:  Mercidyl Gelig Thurfjell; Anders Lindgren; Erik Thurfjell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Identifying Adverse Drug Events by Relational Learning.

Authors:  David Page; Vítor Santos Costa; Sriraam Natarajan; Aubrey Barnard; Peggy Peissig; Michael Caldwell
Journal:  Proc Conf AAAI Artif Intell       Date:  2012-07

3.  Unachievable Region in Precision-Recall Space and Its Effect on Empirical Evaluation.

Authors:  Kendrick Boyd; Vítor Santos Costa; Jesse Davis; C David Page
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Mach Learn       Date:  2012-12-01

4.  Is age at diagnosis an independent prognostic factor for survival following breast cancer?

Authors:  Upali W Jayasinghe; Richard Taylor; John Boyages
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 5.  Local outcomes in ductal carcinoma in situ based on patient and tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Stuart J Schnitt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

6.  Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Laszlo Tabar; Hsiu-Hsi Tony Chen; M F Amy Yen; Tibor Tot; Tao-Hsin Tung; Li-Sheng Chen; Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Stephen W Duffy; Robert A Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The influence of young age on outcome in early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  B L Fowble; D J Schultz; B Overmoyer; L J Solin; K Fox; L Jardines; S Orel; J H Glick
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-08-30       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Information Extraction for Clinical Data Mining: A Mammography Case Study.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Ryan Woods; Elizabeth Burnside; Mehmet Ayvaci; Jude Shavlik; David Page
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Data Min       Date:  2009

9.  Logical Differential Prediction Bayes Net, improving breast cancer diagnosis for older women.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Yirong Wu; David Page; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Support Vector Machines for Differential Prediction.

Authors:  Finn Kuusisto; Vitor Santos Costa; Houssam Nassif; Elizabeth Burnside; David Page; Jude Shavlik
Journal:  Mach Learn Knowl Discov Databases       Date:  2014

2.  Improving ascertainment of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt with natural language processing.

Authors:  Cosmin A Bejan; Michael Ripperger; Drew Wilimitis; Ryan Ahmed; JooEun Kang; Katelyn Robinson; Theodore J Morley; Douglas M Ruderfer; Colin G Walsh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Integrating Expert Knowledge with Data in Bayesian Networks: Preserving Data-Driven Expectations when the Expert Variables Remain Unobserved.

Authors:  Anthony Costa Constantinou; Norman Fenton; Martin Neil
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 6.954

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.