Literature DB >> 8064188

A method for predicting the volume of an ileo-anal pouch.

J G Williams1, J A Heine, D L Stoller, D A Rothenberger.   

Abstract

Functional outcome following restorative proctocolectomy depends, in part, on the volume of the pouch. This study investigates the relationship between the length of ileum and volume of saline required to distend the ileum to a set pressure, and the possibility of predicting the volume of an ileoanal pouch using these measurements. Measurements were made on the ileum of 8 mongrel dogs. There was a linear relationship between the length of ileum and volume of saline infused to produce an intraluminal pressure of 20 mmHg (r = 0.94-0.99). However, the capacity of ileum varied widely from animal to animal (100 cc of saline filled 15.5 cm to 43 cm of ileum). Twenty-four pouches (15J, 9S) were constructed from segments of ileum of known capacity. The capacity of a J pouch was 1.71 +/- 0.11 times greater than the capacity of the original length of bowel and an S pouch had a capacity 2.14 +/- 0.25 times greater. These changes in capacity are similar to a theoretical calculation of change in volume of ileum after pouch construction. This technique is a simple, quick method of predicting the volume of an ileo-anal pouch which will be useful in a clinical trial to compare function of pouches of different volumes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8064188     DOI: 10.1007/bf00699422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

1.  Pouch size: the important functional determinant after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren; S Akervall; L Hultén
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Long-term functional analysis of the ileoanal reservoir.

Authors:  S D Wexner; L Jensen; D A Rothenberger; W D Wong; S M Goldberg
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Mathematical prediction of ileal pouch capacity.

Authors:  W H Thomson; A H Simpson; J L Wheeler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Comparison of the function of triplicated and duplicated pelvic ileal reservoirs after mucosal proctectomy and ileo-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  D G Nasmyth; N S Williams; D Johnston
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  A clinico-physiological comparison of ileal pouch-anal and straight ileoanal anastomoses.

Authors:  B M Taylor; B Cranley; K A Kelly; S F Phillips; R W Beart; R R Dozois
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Ileoanal pouch compliance and motor function.

Authors:  M D Levitt; M A Kamm; J Groom; P R Hawley; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Comparative intrinsic and extrinsic compliance characteristics of S, J, and W ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  M L Thayer; R D Madoff; D M Jacobs; M P Bubrick
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A single surgeon's experience with 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J M Becker; J L Raymond
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs.

Authors:  R J Nicholls; M E Pezim
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  D G Nasmyth; D Johnston; P G Godwin; M F Dixon; A Smith; N S Williams
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.