Literature DB >> 4016516

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a comparison of three reservoir designs.

R J Nicholls, M E Pezim.   

Abstract

One hundred and four patients were treated by restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis. Three different designs of reservoir were used (triple loop 68, double loop 13, quadruple loop 23). There were no postoperative deaths but six (5.8 per cent) had the reservoir removed. Rates for pelvic sepsis were 25, 15 and 13 per cent, and for intestinal obstruction requiring laparotomy 14.7,0 and 8.6 per cent. Function was assessed in 88 patients (58, 12 and 18) after mean intervals from closure of the ileostomy of 23.7, 12.7 and 4.5 months. Frequency of defaecation per 24 h was 3.7 +/- 1.6, 5.5 +/- 1.6 and 4.1 +/- 1.3, being significantly greater for double loop reservoirs; night evacuation was more prevalent in the same group (26, 58 and 22 per cent). Significantly fewer patients with triple than with double loop reservoirs required antidiarrhoeal medication (19 and 58 per cent). Normal continence occurred in 67, 75 and 89 per cent of patients in the three groups. All patients with double or quadruple loop reservoirs defaecated spontaneously while only 41 per cent with triple loop reservoirs did so. Mean intra-operative reservoir volumes were 177 +/- 64, 172 +/- 58 and 325 +/- 37 ml and volumes after closure of the ileostomy were 416 +/- 176, 197 +/- 69 and 322 +/- 33 ml respectively. Double loop reservoirs were significantly smaller than the other two designs after ileostomy closure. There was an inverse relationship between reservoir volumes and frequency. A quadruple loop reservoir directly connected to the anal sphincter preserved spontaneous evacuation and resulted in function similar to that obtained with the triple loop reservoir.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4016516     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800720622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  65 in total

Review 1.  Results of pouch surgery after ileo-anal anastomosis: the implications of pouchitis.

Authors:  B J Fozard; J H Pemberton
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  The results of pouch surgery after ileo-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease: the manometric assessment of pouch continence and its reservoir function.

Authors:  M Pescatori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Proctocolectomy and stapled ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy.

Authors:  E Landi; A Fianchini; L Landa; C Marmorale; G Corradini; S De Luca; V Piloni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Pelvic pouch emptying scan: an evaluation of scintigraphic assessment of the neorectum.

Authors:  K Woolfson; R S McLeod; S Walfisch; K Yip; Z Cohen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  [Physiologic aspects of postoperative continence following ileoanal anastomosis with and without intrapelvic reservoir].

Authors:  A M Holschneider
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1987

6.  Serum biochemical evaluation of patients with functional pouches ten to 20 years after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  Amosy Ephreim M'Koma
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.

Authors:  W B Tuckson; M J McNamara; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 8.  Evolution of the restorative proctocolectomy and its effects on gastrointestinal hormones.

Authors:  Amosy E M'Koma; Paul E Wise; Roberta L Muldoon; David A Schwartz; Mary K Washington; Alan J Herline
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients.

Authors:  T Oresland; S Fasth; S Nordgren; L Hultén
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Pathology of the defunctioned rectum in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  B F Warren; N A Shepherd; D C Bartolo; J W Bradfield
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.