Literature DB >> 2924667

Long-term functional analysis of the ileoanal reservoir.

S D Wexner1, L Jensen, D A Rothenberger, W D Wong, S M Goldberg.   

Abstract

Since November 1980, 180 patients underwent abdominal colectomy, rectal mucosectomy, ileoanal reservoir construction, and ileoanal anastomosis at the authors' institutions. One hundred twenty-nine patients had restoration of intestinal continuity before the end of 1986. One hundred fourteen of these patients (88 percent) were available for follow-up at a mean length of time of 5.0 years from ileostomy closure (range, 16 to 88 months). The mean number of pouch evacuations was 5.4 +/- 2.5 during the day (range, 1 to 12) and 1.5 +/- 1.0 at night (range, 0 to 6). Ninety-one percent of patients reported perfect or almost perfect daytime continence, and 74 percent found this true at night. Sixty-three percent of patients believed their pouch function continued to improve over many years. Ninety-five percent of patients questioned would choose an ileoanal reservoir again instead of a permanent ileostomy. This long-term assessment of the function of the ileoanal reservoir confirms that it is a viable, although not perfect, option in the management of ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2924667     DOI: 10.1007/BF02553479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  25 in total

1.  Reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  E W Fonkalsrud; J Bustorff-Silva
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Functional outcome and quality of life following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in Indians.

Authors:  Uday Somashekar; Subash Gupta; Arvinder Soin; Samiran Nundy
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  The results of pouch surgery after ileo-anal anastomosis for inflammatory bowel disease: the manometric assessment of pouch continence and its reservoir function.

Authors:  M Pescatori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?

Authors:  Art Hiranyakas; Assar Rather; Giovanna da Silva; Eric G Weiss; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Restorative proctocolectomy: the Irish experience. Irish Association of Coloproctology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1990 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Complications associated with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

Authors:  K McMullen; T C Hicks; J E Ray; J B Gathright; A E Timmcke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The use of an ileostomy connector to diminish the frequency of defecation prior to ileostomy closure in patients with a pelvic pouch.

Authors:  K Maeda; M Hashimoto; J Koh; O Yamamoto; Y Hosoda; Y Morikawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Effect of anorectal eversion on long-term clinical outcome of restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  D J DeFriend; M Mughal; R H Grace; P F Schofield
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Pouchitis: result of microbial imbalance?

Authors:  J G Ruseler-van Embden; W R Schouten; L M van Lieshout
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.

Authors:  T Hallgren; S Fasth; D S Delbro; S Nordgren; T Oresland; L Hultén
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.