Literature DB >> 3719274

Factors influencing bowel function after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.

D G Nasmyth, D Johnston, P G Godwin, M F Dixon, A Smith, N S Williams.   

Abstract

Seventeen patients were studied 3-31 months (median 6.4 months) after mucosal proctectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis (n = 15) or adenomatous polyposis (n = 2). Seven had a triplicated pouch, and ten a duplicated pouch. Clinical bowel function was determined by detailed questionnaire, and correlations sought between clinical end-points such as frequency of defaecation, urgency of defaecation and continence, and the results of laboratory investigations, comprising anal manometry, capacity and compliance of the pouch, completeness of emptying, faecal bacteriology and mucosal inflammation. Frequency of defaecation was found to be inversely correlated with both the capacity (rs = -0.66, P less than 0.01) and the compliance (rs = -0.53, P less than 0.05) of the pouch. Patients who could postpone defaecation for greater than 30 min had higher anal squeeze pressures (P less than 0.05) than patients who had greater urgency of defaecation. Patients with perfect anal continence had higher resting anal pressure (P less than 0.05) and emptied the pouch more completely (P less than 0.01) than patients who experienced minor leakage. The faecal flora of the pouches showed a greater predominance of anaerobes (P less than 0.01) and increased numbers of bacteroides (P less than 0.01) compared with the faecal flora of ileostomies, but the changes in the flora did not correlate with any aspect of bowel function. The best clinical results (i.e. perfect continence, low frequency of defaecation and little urgency) were associated with high anal pressure and with large volume, high compliance and complete emptying of the pouch. The completeness of emptying was similar for both designs of pouch, but the capacity and compliance of triplicated pouches were greater than the capacity and compliance of duplicated J pouches (P less than 0.05), and this was associated with a better clinical result in the triplicated pouches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3719274     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800730617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  33 in total

1.  Key factors influencing bowel function after ileal W-pouch anal anastomosis: a spectral analysis of W-pouch motor activity.

Authors:  T Maruta; S Homma; M Yagi; J Hasegawa; K Shimamura; T Suda; Y Sakai; K Hatakeyama
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  Results of pouch surgery after ileo-anal anastomosis: the implications of pouchitis.

Authors:  B J Fozard; J H Pemberton
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Proctocolectomy and stapled ileo-anal anastomosis without mucosal proctectomy.

Authors:  E Landi; A Fianchini; L Landa; C Marmorale; G Corradini; S De Luca; V Piloni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Stapled ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis without a temporary diverting ileostomy.

Authors:  H J Sugerman; H H Newsome; G Decosta; A M Zfass
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Mucosal morphology and faecal bacteriology after ileoanal anastomosis.

Authors:  J Santavirta; J Mattila; M Kokki; M Matikainen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Impact of anal manipulation and pouch design on ileal pouch function.

Authors:  W B Tuckson; M J McNamara; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Pouch dynamics--a simple test of ileo-anal pouch evacuation.

Authors:  M D Levitt; M A Kamm; R J Nicholls
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Anal transition zone in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Jennifer Holder-Murray; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Determinants of ileoanal pouch function.

Authors:  M D Levitt; A A Lewis
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Effects of the faecal stream and stasis on the ileal pouch mucosa.

Authors:  H J de Silva; P R Millard; N Soper; M Kettlewell; N Mortensen; D P Jewell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.