Literature DB >> 8058452

Classification and perceived similarity of compound gratings that differ in relative spatial phase.

M J Kahana1, P J Bennett.   

Abstract

Discrimination studies suggest that two, and only two, channels encode relative spatial phase shifts in compound gratings (Bennett & Banks, 1991; Field & Nachmias, 1984). The more sensitive channel consists of even-symmetric filters and responds best to cosine phase shifts (e.g., 0 degree-180 degrees); the other consists of odd-symmetric filters and responds best to sine phase shifts (e.g., 90 degrees-270 degrees). The present experiments investigated whether the two-channel model generalizes to suprathreshold perceptual tasks. Experiment 1 examined classification learning of compound gratings, consisting of a fundamental (f) and second harmonic (2f), that differed in 2f contrast and relative phase. Experiments 2 and 3 measured the perceived similarity of f + 2f gratings. The results of Experiment 1 were broadly consistent with the predictions of the two-channel model. Specifically, the classification data were best explained by assuming that classification was based on the responses of differentially sensitive even- and odd-symmetric filters. In Experiments 2 and 3, two-dimensional multidimensional scaling solutions provided a good account for the similarity judgments. In Experiment 2, Dimension 1 was strongly correlated with cosine phase, and Dimension 2 was moderately correlated with sine phase. In Experiment 3, cosine phase was again strongly related to Dimension 1, whereas the absolute value of sine phase was strongly related to Dimension 2. Overall, these results suggest that the two-channel model of phase discrimination provides a useful framework for interpreting classification and similarity judgments of compound gratings.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8058452     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  The effects of contrast, spatial scale, and orientation on foveal and peripheral phase discrimination.

Authors:  P J Bennett; M S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Evidence for edge and bar detectors in human vision.

Authors:  D C Burr; M C Morrone; D Spinelli
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

4.  Attention and learning processes in the identification and categorization of integral stimuli.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral vision.

Authors:  P J Bennett; M S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Apr 30-May 6       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Loss of spatial phase relationships in extrafoveal vision.

Authors:  I Rentschler; B Treutwein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Jan 24-30       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The harmonic bandwidth of phase-reversal discrimination.

Authors:  P J Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-03

9.  How do we discriminate relative spatial phase?

Authors:  D R Badcock
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  A demonstration of the visual importance and flexibility of spatial-frequency amplitude and phase.

Authors:  L N Piotrowski; F W Campbell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  7 in total

1.  Spatial phase differences can drive apparent motion.

Authors:  A B Sekuler; P J Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

2.  Unpacking Intuition: A Conjecture.

Authors:  Martin E P Seligman; Michael Kahana
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-07

3.  Intracranial electroencephalography reveals two distinct similarity effects during item recognition.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Andreas Schulze-Bonhage; Robert Sekuler; Brian Litt; Armin Brandt; Gordon Baltuch; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  An electrophysiological signature of summed similarity in visual working memory.

Authors:  Marieke K van Vugt; Robert Sekuler; Hugh R Wilson; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2012-09-10

5.  Lure similarity affects visual episodic recognition: detailed tests of a noisy exemplar model.

Authors:  Michael J Kahana; Feng Zhou; Aaron S Geller; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

6.  Similarity effect and optimal control of multiple-choice decision making.

Authors:  Moran Furman; Xiao-Jing Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Why are some people's names easier to learn than others? The effects of face similarity on memory for face-name associations.

Authors:  Peter C Pantelis; Marieke K van Vugt; Robert Sekuler; Hugh R Wilson; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.