Literature DB >> 8056524

Vergence eye movements under natural viewing conditions.

G K Hung1, K J Ciuffreda, J L Semmlow, J L Horng.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether there are any fundamental differences in vergence dynamics under different viewing conditions, both in instrument space and free space.
METHODS: Symmetric vergence responses were measured for a variety of conditions under the traditional instrument space as well as the more natural free space viewing environment. Vergence eye movements were recorded objectively in three subjects using the infrared reflection technique. Within each environment, four conditions were tested: aperiodic self-initiated voluntary gaze shifts between two simultaneously viewed targets; periodic (0.33 Hz) voluntary gaze shifts between the same two targets; gaze shifts in total darkness to the near target following initial far target fixation in the light; and gaze shifts in total darkness to the two remembered target positions. In addition, an experiment was performed in instrument space using randomized step changes of target disparity, in which the responses served as the standard for comparison. For all conditions, target disparities ranged from 0.5 degrees to 10 degrees. The peak velocity of each vergence response was calculated and plotted versus its amplitude.
RESULTS: It was found that the data for all conditions tested fell within the standard "main sequence" cluster, indicating similarity in dynamics and thus similarity in the motoneuronal controller signal. Also, the data from investigators who claimed differences in dynamics were also typically found to fall within the normal cluster.
CONCLUSIONS: This indicates that the vergence motoneuronal controller signal produced the same dynamics for a particular response amplitude, independent of both viewing environment and test condition.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8056524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  10 in total

1.  Capturing the Moment of Fusion Loss in Intermittent Exotropia.

Authors:  John R Economides; Daniel L Adams; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Saccades during symmetrical vergence.

Authors:  Olivier A Coubard; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Functional anatomy of human extraocular muscles during fusional divergence.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The first and second order dynamics of accommodative convergence and disparity convergence.

Authors:  James Maxwell; Jianliang Tong; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Accommodative and vergence responses to conflicting blur and disparity stimuli during development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Consequences of traumatic brain injury for human vergence dynamics.

Authors:  Christopher W Tyler; Lora T Likova; Kristyo N Mineff; Anas M Elsaid; Spero C Nicholas
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Evaluation of the Tobii EyeX Eye tracking controller and Matlab toolkit for research.

Authors:  Agostino Gibaldi; Mauricio Vanegas; Peter J Bex; Guido Maiello
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-06

8.  The relationship between reflex eye realignment and the percept of single vision in young children.

Authors:  Kimberly Meier; Deanna L Lundell; Eric S Seemiller; Deborah Giaschi; Laurie M Wilcox; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Vergence Fusion Sustaining Oscillations.

Authors:  John Semmlow; Chang Yaramothu; Mitchell Scheiman; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 0.957

10.  Disparity vergence responses before versus after repetitive vergence therapy in binocularly normal controls.

Authors:  Henry Talasan; Mitchell Scheiman; Xiaobo Li; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.