John R Economides1, Daniel L Adams2, Jonathan C Horton3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, The University of Trento, Trento, Italy. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: hortonj@vision.ucsf.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize eye movements made by patients with intermittent exotropia when fusion loss occurs spontaneously and to compare them with those induced by covering 1 eye and with strategies used to recover fusion. DESIGN: Prospective study of a patient cohort referred to our laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen patients with typical findings of intermittent exotropia who experienced frequent spontaneous loss of fusion. METHODS: The position of each eye was recorded with a video eye tracker under infrared illumination while fixating on a small central near target. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eye position and peak velocity measured during spontaneous loss of fusion, shutter-induced loss of fusion, and recovery of fusion. RESULTS: In 10 of 13 subjects, the eye movement made after spontaneous loss of fusion was indistinguishable from that induced by covering 1 eye. It reached 90% of full amplitude in a mean of 1.75 seconds. Peak velocity of the deviating eye's movement was highly correlated for spontaneous and shutter-induced events. Peak velocity was also proportional to exotropia amplitude. Recovery of fusion was more rapid than loss of fusion, and often was accompanied by interjection of a disconjugate saccade. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of fusion in intermittent exotropia is not influenced by visual feedback. Excessive divergence tone may be responsible, but breakdown of alignment occurs via a unique, pathological type of eye movement that differs from a normal, physiological divergence eye movement.
PURPOSE: To characterize eye movements made by patients with intermittent exotropia when fusion loss occurs spontaneously and to compare them with those induced by covering 1 eye and with strategies used to recover fusion. DESIGN: Prospective study of a patient cohort referred to our laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirteen patients with typical findings of intermittent exotropia who experienced frequent spontaneous loss of fusion. METHODS: The position of each eye was recorded with a video eye tracker under infrared illumination while fixating on a small central near target. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eye position and peak velocity measured during spontaneous loss of fusion, shutter-induced loss of fusion, and recovery of fusion. RESULTS: In 10 of 13 subjects, the eye movement made after spontaneous loss of fusion was indistinguishable from that induced by covering 1 eye. It reached 90% of full amplitude in a mean of 1.75 seconds. Peak velocity of the deviating eye's movement was highly correlated for spontaneous and shutter-induced events. Peak velocity was also proportional to exotropia amplitude. Recovery of fusion was more rapid than loss of fusion, and often was accompanied by interjection of a disconjugate saccade. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of fusion in intermittent exotropia is not influenced by visual feedback. Excessive divergence tone may be responsible, but breakdown of alignment occurs via a unique, pathological type of eye movement that differs from a normal, physiological divergence eye movement.
Authors: Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; Vina Manjunath; Olaoluwakitan Osunkunle; Michael P Clarke; Jenny C A Read Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-04-12 Impact factor: 4.799