Literature DB >> 8050134

Characterization of 24-hour growth hormone secretion in acromegaly: implications for diagnosis and therapy.

K Y Ho1, A J Weissberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early studies of acromegaly undertaken before the general availability of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) assays have used arbitrary and varying growth hormone (GH) threshold levels for diagnosing and assessing outcome of treatment for this disease. We have undertaken a detailed study of GH secretion and its relationship to IGF-I levels to assess the usefulness of GH and IGF-I measurements in the assessment of acromegaly. PATIENTS: Thirty acromegalic subjects (12 untreated and 16 previously treated) and 30 age and sex-matched normal subjects were studied. MEASUREMENTS: Twenty-four-hour GH secretion was obtained from 20-minute sampling and serum IGF-I was measured. Comparisons were made of IGF-I, mean 24-hour GH concentration, and of the pulsatile and diurnal characteristics of GH secretion between the two groups.
RESULTS: IGF-I levels in untreated acromegaly were elevated and clearly separated from the normal range. Mean 24-hour GH concentrations in untreated and treated acromegalic subjects with elevated IGF-I (> 40 nmol/l) were greater than (P < 0.01), and showed good separation from, those of normal subjects only after age-matching. From the 24-hour profiles, nadir GH levels in normal subjects fell below the level of detectability while those in untreated acromegalic subjects did not. Pulse amplitude (P < 0.01), ratio of pulsatile to non-pulsatile GH release and the night to daytime GH ratio (P < 0.05) were significantly reduced in acromegaly. In the six patients who attained normal IGF-I levels after surgery, pulsatile characteristics remained abnormal in four. Mean 24-hour GH was significant related (r = 0.57) to IGF-I. A random GH concentration > 2.5 micrograms/l (5 mIU/l) has a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 95% in identifying acromegalic patients who have biochemically active disease (elevated IGF-I) after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with active acromegaly secrete more GH than age-matched normal controls. GH secretion in acromegaly is characterized by marked blunting of pulsatile secretion and, in contrast to normal subjects, the failure of GH to fall to undetectable levels at any time during the 24-hour day. IGF-I measurement is a more practical alternative in the diagnosis of acromegaly and in the assessment of therapeutic outcome. Since abnormalities of GH regulation may persist despite normalization of IGF-I, a distinction between remission and cure should be made. Detailed post-treatment evaluation of GH secretion is necessary to define the nature of underlying GH regulation and to evaluate the risk of disease recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8050134     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1994.tb03787.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)        ISSN: 0300-0664            Impact factor:   3.478


  21 in total

Review 1.  Treatment options in acromegaly. Benefits and costs.

Authors:  L M Weekes; K K Ho; J P Seale
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Medical management of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Michael S Racine; Ariel L Barkan
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Growth hormone responses to oral glucose and intravenous thyrotropin-releasing hormone in acromegalic patients treated by slow-release lanreotide.

Authors:  J J Díez; P Iglesias; A Gómez-Pan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Evaluation of disease activity by IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP3) in acromegaly patients distributed according to a clinical score.

Authors:  H Jasper; P Pennisi; M Vitale; A Mella; G Ropelato; A Chervin
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.256

5.  Three-hour spontaneous GH secretion profile is as reliable as oral glucose tolerance test for the diagnosis of acromegaly.

Authors:  S Grottoli; P Razzore; D Gaia; M Gasperi; M Giusti; A Colao; E Ciccarelli; V Gasco; E Martino; E Ghigo; F Camanni
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 6.  Pitfalls in the biochemical assessment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.107

7.  Gender and age in the biochemical assessment of cure of acromegaly.

Authors:  P U Freda; R E Landman; R E Sundeen; K D Post
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 8.  Monitoring of acromegaly: what should be performed when GH and IGF-1 levels are discrepant?

Authors:  Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 9.  Nanomedicines in the treatment of acromegaly: focus on pegvisomant.

Authors:  Ferdinand Roelfsema; Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira; Johannes Romijn
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2006

10.  Therapeutic options in the management of acromegaly: focus on lanreotide Autogel.

Authors:  Ferdinand Roelfsema; Nienke R Biermasz; Alberto M Pereira; Johannes A Romijn
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.