Literature DB >> 12138989

Gender and age in the biochemical assessment of cure of acromegaly.

P U Freda1, R E Landman, R E Sundeen, K D Post.   

Abstract

The principal biochemical criteria for cure in acromegaly are normalization of both glucose-suppressed GH levels and IGF-I levels. As we have reported previously, measurement of GH by highly sensitive assay in conjunction with IGF-I levels has led to a re-appraisal of "normal" GH suppression criteria during an OGTT in subjects with acromegaly. In some patients with active acromegaly, glucose-suppressed GH levels as measured by highly sensitive assay are much lower than could previously be appreciated with less sensitive GH assays and some other patients in apparent remission have subtle abnormalities of GH suppression. A question to arise is whether gender differences in glucose-suppressed GH levels as found by others in young healthy subjects should be considered in our interpretation of OGTT criteria for cure in acromegaly. Therefore, we have evaluated parameters of GH secretion in a larger number of subjects from our cohort of postoperative patients with acromegaly and in healthy subjects in order to determine if gender or age associated differences in these parameters exist. Ninety-two subjects with acromegaly (49 men, 43 women) and 46 age-matched healthy subjects (26 men, 20 women) were evaluated with baseline GH and IGF-I levels and nadir GH levels after a 100 g. OGTT. GH was assayed by highly sensitive IRMA (DSL). Basal GH levels were higher in female than in male healthy subjects, but the fall in GH from baseline (% suppression) was also greater in females resulting in no significant difference in mean nadir GH levels in female vs. male healthy subjects (0.09 vs. 0.08 microg/L). In the subjects with acromegaly, there were no significant gender differences in basal, %GH suppression or nadir GH levels. Basal and nadir GH levels correlated significantly only in subjects with active disease (r=0.84, p<.0001). Similarly, IGF-I levels correlated significantly with basal (r=0.573, p=.0012), and nadir (r=.702, p<.0001) GH levels only in subjects with active disease. Gender differences in IGF-I levels were not apparent in any group of subjects. As expected, IGF-I levels declined with age in those groups of subjects with normal IGF-I levels. Nadir GH levels did not vary with age. In conclusion, we have not found significant gender or age-related differences in nadir GH levels and thus our data does not support separate OGTT criteria for cure in men and women with acromegaly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12138989     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015314906972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  48 in total

Review 1.  Nutritional regulation of IGF-I and IGF binding proteins.

Authors:  D R Clemmons; L E Underwood
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 11.848

2.  Increased pulsatile, but not basal, growth hormone secretion rates and plasma insulin-like growth factor I levels during the periovulatory interval in normal women.

Authors:  P Ovesen; N Vahl; S Fisker; J D Veldhuis; J S Christiansen; J O Jørgensen
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Seminars in medicine of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Insulin-like growth factors.

Authors:  D Le Roith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I/somatomedin-C in acromegaly: correlation with the degree of growth hormone hypersecretion.

Authors:  A L Barkan; I Z Beitins; R P Kelch
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Effects of oral versus transdermal estrogen on the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor I axis in younger and older postmenopausal women: a clinical research center study.

Authors:  M F Bellantoni; J Vittone; A T Campfield; K M Bass; S M Harman; M R Blackman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Growth hormone (GH)-deficient men are more responsive to GH replacement therapy than women.

Authors:  P Burman; A G Johansson; A Siegbahn; B Vessby; F A Karlsson
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Basal plasma growth hormone levels in man: new evidence for rhythmicity of growth hormone secretion.

Authors:  L M Winer; M A Shaw; G Baumann
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Sex difference in the relation between sellar volume and basal and GH-releasing hormone stimulated GH in acromegaly.

Authors:  A E Smals; G F Pieters; A G Smals; P W Kloppenborg
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Copenh)       Date:  1988-03

9.  The sensitivity of growth hormone secretion to medical treatment in acromegalic patients: influence of age and sex.

Authors:  A J van der Lely; A G Harris; S W Lamberts
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.478

10.  Evaluation of disease status with sensitive measures of growth hormone secretion in 60 postoperative patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  P U Freda; K D Post; J S Powell; S L Wardlaw
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  13 in total

1.  Basal and glucose-suppressed GH levels less than 1 microg/L in newly diagnosed acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda; Carlos M Reyes; Abu T Nuruzzaman; Robert E Sundeen; Jeffrey N Bruce
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 2.  Update on prognostic factors in acromegaly: Is a risk score possible?

Authors:  E Fernandez-Rodriguez; F F Casanueva; I Bernabeu
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Serum proteome changes in acromegalic patients following transsphenoidal surgery: novel biomarkers of disease activity.

Authors:  Diana Cruz-Topete; Britt Christensen; Lucila Sackmann-Sala; Shigeru Okada; Jens Otto L Jorgensen; John J Kopchick
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 4.  Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly.

Authors:  Katharina Schilbach; Christian J Strasburger; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 5.  Pitfalls in the biochemical assessment of acromegaly.

Authors:  Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 6.  Monitoring of acromegaly: what should be performed when GH and IGF-1 levels are discrepant?

Authors:  Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 3.478

Review 7.  Dynamic tests for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment efficacy in acromegaly.

Authors:  Laure Cazabat; Jean-Claude Souberbielle; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 8.  Medical therapy of acromegaly: efficacy and safety of somatostatin analogues.

Authors:  Richard A Feelders; Leo J Hofland; Maarten O van Aken; Sebastian J Neggers; Steven W J Lamberts; Wouter W de Herder; Aart-Jan van der Lely
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Biochemical Control in Acromegaly With Multimodality Therapies: Outcomes From a Pituitary Center and Changes Over Time.

Authors:  Alireza Ghajar; Pamela S Jones; Francisco J Guarda; Alex Faje; Nicholas A Tritos; Karen K Miller; Brooke Swearingen; Lisa B Nachtigall
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 10.  The endocrine tumor summit 2008: appraising therapeutic approaches for acromegaly and carcinoid syndrome.

Authors:  Anne Klibanski; Shlomo Melmed; David R Clemmons; Annamaria Colao; Regina S Cunningham; Mark E Molitch; Aaron I Vinik; Daphne T Adelman; Karen J P Liebert
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.