Literature DB >> 14971738

Pitfalls in the biochemical assessment of acromegaly.

Pamela U Freda1.   

Abstract

The biochemical assessment for newly recognized acromegaly is in most, but not all patients straightforward. Although significant improvements in the methods of biochemical testing for acromegaly have recently been made, major pitfalls to the assessment of this disease still exist. A number of different schemes have been employed for the assessment of GH secretion in clinical practice. Random GH levels have been often used, but remain unreliable for the assessment of acromegaly. Mean GH levels are also frequently used to assess GH status, but are not specific for the diagnosis of acromegaly. Measurement of glucose suppressed GH levels is the preferred method for assessing GH secretion in acromegaly. However, it is essential to recognize that when using highly sensitive and specific GH assays, nadir GH levels can be < 1 microg/L after oral glucose in some patients with newly diagnosed acromegaly and postoperative patients with active disease. On the other hand, when using most clinically available commercial GH assays which are less sensitive and specific than those used in research studies, failure of GH suppression into the normal range set in these studies is not alone diagnostic of active acromegaly. In order to diagnose acromegaly, documentation of GH excess should be accompanied by elevation in levels of the GH dependent peptide, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Consideration also needs to be given to the clinical context in which GH and IGF-I are being measured as both can be altered in a number of clinical settings other than acromegaly. Both IGF-I and GH evaluations are important and complimentary parts of the biochemical assessment of acromegaly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14971738     DOI: 10.1023/b:pitu.0000011174.79946.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   4.107


  58 in total

1.  Serum-free insulin-like growth factor I correlates with clearance in patients with chronic renal failure.

Authors:  J Frystyk; P Ivarsen; C Skjaerbaek; A Flyvbjerg; E B Pedersen; H Orskov
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 10.612

Review 2.  Nutritional regulation of IGF-I and IGF binding proteins.

Authors:  D R Clemmons; L E Underwood
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 11.848

3.  Variety in growth hormone determinations due to use of different immunoassays and to the interference of growth hormone-binding protein.

Authors:  L Ebdrup; S Fisker; H H Sørensen; M B Ranke; H Orskov
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  1999

Review 4.  Normal values of insulin-like growth factor I and their clinical utility in adults.

Authors:  C J Strasburger; M Bidlingmaier; Z Wu; K M Morrison
Journal:  Horm Res       Date:  2001

5.  Defective suppression of growth hormone after oral glucose loading in adolescence.

Authors:  G F Pieters; A G Smals; P W Kloppenborg
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Preoperative growth hormone response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone and oral glucose tolerance test in acromegaly: a retrospective evaluation of 50 patients.

Authors:  L De Marinis; A Mancini; A Bianchi; R Gentilella; D Valle; A Giampietro; P Zuppi; C Anile; G Maira; A Giustina
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.694

7.  Gender and age in the biochemical assessment of cure of acromegaly.

Authors:  P U Freda; R E Landman; R E Sundeen; K D Post
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.107

8.  Somatotropin pulse frequency and basal concentrations are increased in acromegaly and are reduced by successful therapy.

Authors:  M L Hartman; J D Veldhuis; M L Vance; A C Faria; R W Furlanetto; M O Thorner
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Determinants of clinical outcome and survival in acromegaly.

Authors:  C Rajasoorya; I M Holdaway; P Wrightson; D J Scott; H K Ibbertson
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.478

10.  Evaluation of disease status with sensitive measures of growth hormone secretion in 60 postoperative patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  P U Freda; K D Post; J S Powell; S L Wardlaw
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  12 in total

1.  Is GH nadir during OGTT a reliable test for diagnosis of acromegaly in patients with abnormal glucose metabolism?

Authors:  Georgiana Dobri; Soamsiri Niwattisaiwong; James F Bena; Manjula Gupta; John Kirwan; Lawrence Kennedy; Amir H Hamrahian
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  Biochemical investigations in diagnosis and follow up of acromegaly.

Authors:  Katharina Schilbach; Christian J Strasburger; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 3.  Guidelines for the treatment of growth hormone excess and growth hormone deficiency in adults.

Authors:  A Giustina; A Barkan; P Chanson; A Grossman; A Hoffman; E Ghigo; F Casanueva; A Colao; S Lamberts; M Sheppard; S Melmed
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 4.  Current diagnosis of acromegaly.

Authors:  Rocio A Cordero; Ariel L Barkan
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 5.  Dynamic tests for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment efficacy in acromegaly.

Authors:  Laure Cazabat; Jean-Claude Souberbielle; Philippe Chanson
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 6.  Measurement of human growth hormone by immunoassays: current status, unsolved problems and clinical consequences.

Authors:  Martin Bidlingmaier; Pamela U Freda
Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 2.372

Review 7.  Discordance between growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 after pituitary surgery for acromegaly: a stepwise approach and management.

Authors:  Mehdi Zeinalizadeh; Zohreh Habibi; Juan C Fernandez-Miranda; Paul A Gardner; Steven P Hodak; Sue M Challinor
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 8.  Defining normalcy of the somatotropic axis: an attainable goal?

Authors:  Ariel L Barkan
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Medical therapy of acromegaly.

Authors:  U Plöckinger
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.257

Review 10.  Management of acromegaly in Latin America: expert panel recommendations.

Authors:  Ariel Barkan; Marcello D Bronstein; Oscar D Bruno; Alejandro Cob; Ana Laura Espinosa-de-los-Monteros; Monica R Gadelha; Gloria Garavito; Mirtha Guitelman; Ruth Mangupli; Moisés Mercado; Lesly Portocarrero; Michael Sheppard
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.