UNLABELLED: To facilitate the estimation of acromegalic activity a prospective study was done comparing, against a clinical score, the effectiveness of serum IGF-I, IGFBP3 and the IGF-I/IGFBP3 molar ratio. Sixty nine observations were distributed in three groups: Group I=patients before surgery; group II=patients improved but still clinically active; group III=patients clinically inactive. Suppression of serum GH levels one hour after an oral glucose load was in agreement with the clinical score in 21/22 observations. Increases in serum IGF-I and IGFBP3 levels were similarly frequent: both 100% in group I, 80% and 95% in group II, 9% and 36% in group III, respectively. The frequency of abnormal molar ratios was 95%, 40% and 0% in the same groups. Log IGF-I, log IGFBP3, and log molar ratio correlated significantly with the clinical scores (r=0.873, r=0.692, and r=0.829, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The IGF-I/IGFBP3 molar ratio was not better than either IGF-I or IGFBP3 in detecting activity in the three groups of patients studied. Both IGF-I and IGFBP3 appear comparably useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of acromegalic patients. Since IGF-I is a more biologically meaningful parameter it might be preferable.
UNLABELLED: To facilitate the estimation of acromegalic activity a prospective study was done comparing, against a clinical score, the effectiveness of serum IGF-I, IGFBP3 and the IGF-I/IGFBP3 molar ratio. Sixty nine observations were distributed in three groups: Group I=patients before surgery; group II=patients improved but still clinically active; group III=patients clinically inactive. Suppression of serum GH levels one hour after an oral glucose load was in agreement with the clinical score in 21/22 observations. Increases in serum IGF-I and IGFBP3 levels were similarly frequent: both 100% in group I, 80% and 95% in group II, 9% and 36% in group III, respectively. The frequency of abnormal molar ratios was 95%, 40% and 0% in the same groups. Log IGF-I, log IGFBP3, and log molar ratio correlated significantly with the clinical scores (r=0.873, r=0.692, and r=0.829, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The IGF-I/IGFBP3 molar ratio was not better than either IGF-I or IGFBP3 in detecting activity in the three groups of patients studied. Both IGF-I and IGFBP3 appear comparably useful for the diagnosis and follow-up of acromegalicpatients. Since IGF-I is a more biologically meaningful parameter it might be preferable.
Authors: S Grottoli; P Razzore; D Gaia; M Gasperi; M Giusti; A Colao; E Ciccarelli; V Gasco; E Martino; E Ghigo; F Camanni Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.256