Literature DB >> 8046143

The internal representation of spectral contrast in hearing-impaired listeners.

V Summers1, M R Leek.   

Abstract

Abnormal frequency resolution associated with sensorineural hearing impairment produces a smearing of spectral detail in the internal representation of complex acoustic stimuli. As a result, listeners with hearing loss may have difficulty locating spectral peaks (e.g., vowel formants) within stimuli which cue their identity. This study examined the relationship between frequency separation of peaks in a complex spectrum and the degree of spectral contrast preserved in the internal representations in normal and impaired auditory systems. Hearing-impaired and normal-hearing subjects discriminated a flat-spectrum bandpass stimulus from a stimulus containing a sinusoidal ripple across its frequency range. The peak-to-valley amplitude (in dB) necessary for detection of the ripple was measured for ripple frequencies ranging from 1 to 9 cycles/oct. Auditory filter characteristics were also measured at 1 and 3 kHz in order to examine the internal representations of the stimuli after cochlear processing. There were clear differences between groups in both auditory filter characteristics and spectral contrast detection. However, the amount of contrast in the internal representations predicted from these measurements was nearly the same for all subjects, suggesting that the reduced frequency resolution of the hearing-impaired group was largely responsible for differences in required peak-to-valley amplitude in the input spectra. Further, for all subjects, there was a trade-off between the absolute level of internal contrast necessary for ripple detection and the number of samples of this contrast available to the listener.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8046143     DOI: 10.1121/1.409969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  22 in total

1.  How Do You Deal With Uncertainty? Cochlear Implant Users Differ in the Dynamics of Lexical Processing of Noncanonical Inputs.

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Tyler P Ellis; Keith S Apfelbaum
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  How Do Age and Hearing Loss Impact Spectral Envelope Perception?

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; Andrew J Oxenham; Peggy B Nelson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Gary L Jones; Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Distribution of spectral modulation transfer functions in a young, normal-hearing population.

Authors:  Eric C Hoover; Ann C Eddins; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The Effects of Duration and Level on Spectral Modulation Perception.

Authors:  Sittiprapa Isarangura; Ann C Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Spectral tilt change in stop consonant perception by listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Aniket Saoji
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Effect of level on spectral-ripple detection threshold for listeners with normal hearing and hearing loss.

Authors:  Erik J Jorgensen; Ryan W McCreery; Benjamin J Kirby; Marc Brennan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Peggy Nelson; Pamela Souza
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.