Literature DB >> 8040887

Statutory requirements for disclosure of breast cancer treatment alternatives.

S G Nayfield1, G C Bongiovanni, M H Alciati, R A Fischer, L Bergner.   

Abstract

Therapeutic options for breast cancer, particularly for early-stage disease, and increased patient participation in medical decision-making have oriented state legislatures toward ensuring that women with breast cancer have adequate information about treatment alternatives. Currently, 18 states have enacted statutes regarding physician disclosure of treatment alternatives to breast cancer patients. This paper reviews these statutes in the context of the requirements imposed on the physician as health care provider and the content of medical information presented to the patient as a consequence of the laws. State statutes were identified through the National Cancer Institute's State Cancer Legislative Database, and the statutory requirements were analyzed. For statutes requiring development of a written summary of treatment alternatives, the most recent summary was obtained through the responsible state agency, and informational content was analyzed for relevance to treatment decisions in early-stage disease. As a group, these laws address informed consent for treatment, physician behavior within the patient-physician relationship, and the medical information upon which treatment decisions are based. Individual statutes vary in the scope of the issues addressed, particularly in the responsibility placed on physicians, and treatment option summaries developed in response to this legislation vary widely in content and scope. Despite broad implications of these statutes in oncology practice, little is known about their effects on breast cancer care. Additional research is needed to define the impact of these statutes on breast cancer care, as such legislation is considered by other states for this and other diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8040887     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/86.16.1202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  10 in total

1.  Is mastectomy overused? A call for an expanded research agenda.

Authors:  Paula V Lantz; Judith K Zemencuk; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Indu Lakhani; Barbara Salem; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Institutional variation in the surgical treatment of breast cancer: a study of the NCCN.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Stuart R Lipsitz; Melissa E Hughes; Stephen B Edge; Richard Theriault; John L Wilson; W Bradford Carter; Douglas W Blayney; Joyce Niland; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Barbara Salem; Monica Morrow; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-12-06

5.  Modified Radical Mastectomy vs Breast-Conserving Surgery: Current Clinical Practice in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer at a Corporate Tertiary Cancer Center in India.

Authors:  Sachin S Kadam; Pradeep Tripathi; Rohan Jagtap; Rajat Kapoor; Tejaswini Kadam; Prashant Bhandarkar; Sakshi Shimpi
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-04

6.  Underuse of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: patient knowledge, beliefs, and medical mistrust.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jessica Weidmann; Kezhen Fei; Jenny J Lin; Howard Leventhal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go?

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Angela Fagerlin; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  The combined effects of participatory styles of elderly patients and their physicians on satisfaction.

Authors:  K Tom Xu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Audiey Kao; Alma Kuby; Ronald A Thisted
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Shared Decision Making in Health Care: Theoretical Perspectives for Why It Works and For Whom.

Authors:  Ken Resnicow; Delwyn Catley; Kathy Goggin; Sarah Hawley; Geoffrey C Williams
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 2.749

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.