Literature DB >> 17156967

Factors associated with patient involvement in surgical treatment decision making for breast cancer.

Sarah T Hawley1, Paula M Lantz, Nancy K Janz, Barbara Salem, Monica Morrow, Kendra Schwartz, Lihua Liu, Steven J Katz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with women's reported level of involvement in breast cancer surgical treatment decision making, and the factors associated with the match between actual and preferred involvement in this decision.
METHODS: Survey data from breast cancer patients in Detroit and Los Angeles was merged with surgeon data for an analytic dataset of 1101 patients and 277 surgeons. Decisional involvement and the match between actual and preferred amount of involvement were analyzed as three-level dependent variables using multinomial logistic regression controlling for clustering within surgeons. Independent variables included patient demographic and clinical factors, surgeon demographic and practice factors, cancer program designation, and two measures of patient-surgeon communication.
RESULTS: We found variation in women's actual decisional involvement and match between actual and preferred involvement. Women with a surgeon-based or patient-based (versus shared) decision were significantly (p < or = 0.05) younger. Women who had too little decisional involvement (versus the right amount) were younger, while women with too much involvement had less education. Patient-surgeon communication variables were significantly associated with both involvement and match, and higher surgeon volume as associated with too little involvement.
CONCLUSION: Patient factors and patient-surgeon communication influence women's perception of their involvement in breast cancer surgical treatment decision making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Decision tools are needed across surgeons and practice settings to elicit patients' preferences for involvement in treatment decisions for breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17156967      PMCID: PMC1839840          DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  35 in total

1.  Patient involvement in surgery treatment decisions for breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Barbara Salem; Indu Lakhani; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Resist and redirect: physicians respond to breast cancer informed consent legislation.

Authors:  T Montini
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1997

3.  Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Indu Lakhani; Barbara Salem; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Decreased use of adjuvant breast cancer therapy in a randomized controlled trial of a decision aid with individualized risk information.

Authors:  Pamela B Peele; Laura A Siminoff; Ying Xu; Peter M Ravdin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

5.  Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  L F Degner; L J Kristjanson; D Bowman; J A Sloan; K C Carriere; J O'Neil; B Bilodeau; P Watson; B Mueller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Patterns and correlates of local therapy for women with ductal carcinoma-in-situ.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Paula M Lantz; Nancy K Janz; Angela Fagerlin; Kendra Schwartz; Lihua Liu; Dennis Deapen; Barbara Salem; Indu Lakhani; Monica Morrow
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview.

Authors:  A R Localio; J A Berlin; T R Ten Have; S E Kimmel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes?

Authors:  Nancy J O Birkmeyer; Philip P Goodney; Therese A Stukel; Bruce E Hillner; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The physician-patient encounter: the physician as a perfect agent for the patient versus the informed treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  A Gafni; C Charles; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences.

Authors:  Wendy Levinson; Audiey Kao; Alma Kuby; Ronald A Thisted
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  48 in total

1.  Preferred roles in treatment decision making among patients with cancer: a pooled analysis of studies using the Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Jeff A Sloan; Pamela J Atherton; Tenbroeck Smith; Thomas F Hack; Mashele M Huschka; Teresa A Rummans; Matthew M Clark; Brent Diekmann; Lesley F Degner
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Satisfaction with treatment decision-making and treatment regret among Latinas and non-Latina whites with DCIS.

Authors:  Mónica E López; Celia P Kaplan; Anna M Nápoles; E Shelley Hwang; Jennifer C Livaudais; Leah S Karliner
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-09-17

3.  Association of Actual and Preferred Decision Roles With Patient-Reported Quality of Care: Shared Decision Making in Cancer Care.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Mary Beth Landrum; Neeraj K Arora; Patricia A Ganz; Michelle van Ryn; Jennifer W Mack; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  Emerging trends in surgical and adjuvant radiation therapies among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Oyewale O Shiyanbola; Brian L Sprague; John M Hampton; Kim Dittus; Ted A James; Sally Herschorn; Ronald E Gangnon; Donald L Weaver; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Decisional support throughout the cancer journey for older women diagnosed with early stage breast cancer: a single institutional study.

Authors:  Roseanna Presutti; Laura D'Alimonte; Merrylee McGuffin; Hanbert Chen; Edward Chow; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Lisa Di Prospero; Mary Doherty; Alex Kiss; Jennifer Wong; Justin Lee; Stanley Liu; Ellen Warner; Maureen Trudeau; Deb Feldman-Stewart; Tamara Harth; Ewa Szumacher
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Breast cancer treatment decision-making: are we asking too much of patients?

Authors:  Jennifer C Livaudais; Rebeca Franco; Kezhen Fei; Nina A Bickell
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Underuse of breast cancer adjuvant treatment: patient knowledge, beliefs, and medical mistrust.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jessica Weidmann; Kezhen Fei; Jenny J Lin; Howard Leventhal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice.

Authors:  Rachel Zeuner; Dominick L Frosch; Marie D Kuzemchak; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Racial/ethnic disparities in knowledge about risks and benefits of breast cancer treatment: does it matter where you go?

Authors:  Sarah T Hawley; Angela Fagerlin; Nancy K Janz; Steven J Katz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Preferred and actual participation roles during health care decision making in persons with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  J D Tariman; D L Berry; B Cochrane; A Doorenbos; K Schepp
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.