Literature DB >> 7590718

Comparison of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test and cell culture for the detection of urogenital chlamydial infections.

M A Catry1, M J Borrego, J Cardoso, J Azevedo, I Santo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test with the cell culture method, in diagnosing urogenital chlamydial infections.
SUBJECTS: 439 patients (327 women and 112 men) attending one STD clinic and Family Planning and Gynaecological Clinics in Lisbon, Portugal, between November 1993 and March 1994.
METHODS: In women, two endocervical swab samples were collected: one for PCR Amplicor and one for standard culture technique. Men were asked to submit 20 ml of urine (first pass urine) for PCR Amplicor and one urethral specimen was taken for culture. The order of collection of the specimens was rotated every 50 patients. Discrepant results were further analysed by a second PCR with primers directed against the C trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP) and by direct fluorescent antibody (DFA).
RESULTS: After analysis of discrepancies, the adjusted sensitivity and specificity of PCR on endocervical specimens were 92.9% and 100% and the positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 99.7% respectively; on the urine samples these values were 100%, 99.1%, 100% and 99.1%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the PCR Amplicor test is a rapid sensitive and specific assay for the detection of C trachomatis in urogenital infections and provides a non-invasive technique for screening chlamydia infection in men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7590718      PMCID: PMC1195523          DOI: 10.1136/sti.71.4.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genitourin Med        ISSN: 0266-4348


  10 in total

1.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  R Griffais; M Thibon
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.992

2.  Evaluation of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test versus culture in genital samples in various prevalence populations.

Authors:  B de Barbeyrac; I Pellet; B Dutilh; C Bébéar; B Dumon; M Géniaux; C Bébéar
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-06

3.  Rapid genotyping of the Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein by the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  C Sayada; E Denamur; J Orfila; F Catalan; J Elion
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  M J Loeffelholz; C A Lewinski; S R Silver; A P Purohit; S A Herman; D A Buonagurio; E A Dragon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in patients with non-gonococcal urethritis using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  G Ratti; A Moroni; R Cevenini
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Specific amplification of a DNA sequence common to all Chlamydia trachomatis serovars using the polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  B Dutilh; C Bébéar; P Rodriguez; A Vekris; J Bonnet; M Garret
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.992

7.  Development and clinical evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  J M Ossewaarde; M Rieffe; M Rozenberg-Arska; P M Ossenkoppele; R P Nawrocki; A M van Loon
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of polymerase chain reaction, monoclonal antibody based enzyme immunoassay, and cell culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens.

Authors:  C H Wu; M F Lee; S C Yin; D M Yang; S F Cheng
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-risk population: comparison of polymerase chain reaction and cell culture for diagnosis and follow-up.

Authors:  W H Vogels; P C van Voorst Vader; F P Schröder
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men by using a rapid polymerase chain reaction assay.

Authors:  G Jaschek; C A Gaydos; L E Welsh; T C Quinn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.948

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Multiplex AMPLICOR PCR screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in women attenting non-sexually transmitted disease clinics. The European Chlamydia Epidemiology Group.

Authors:  M Bassiri; P A Mårdh; M Domeika
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Genotyping of Portuguese Chlamydia trachomatis urogenital isolates.

Authors:  M J Borrego; J P Gomes; J F Lefebvre; F Eb; J Orfila; M A Catry
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1997-12

3.  Use of a single swab in multi-microbe or flex trans transport medium for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by Roche Amplicor PCR and culture in specimens from two different patient populations.

Authors:  C K Fong; J Falcone; M L Landry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of 2-SP transport medium for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by two automated amplification systems and culture for chlamydia.

Authors:  O Dubuis; M Gorgievski-Hrisoho; D Germann; L Matter
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Evaluation of a strand displacement amplification assay (BD ProbeTec-SDA) for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in urine specimens.

Authors:  Deniz Akduman; Josephine M Ehret; Kimberly Messina; Sharron Ragsdale; Franklyn N Judson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Cross-reactivity between Chlamydia trachomatis heat shock protein 10 and early pregnancy factor.

Authors:  Fotini Betsou; Maria José Borrego; Nicolas Guillaume; Maria Anjos Catry; Sandra Romão; J A Machado-Caetano; Jean Marie Sueur; Jacques Mention; Nicole Faille; Jeanne Orfila
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  2003-05

7.  Prevalence of Chlamydia infection among women visiting a gynaecology outpatient department: evaluation of an in-house PCR assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Achchhe L Patel; Divya Sachdev; Poonam Nagpal; Uma Chaudhry; Subash C Sonkar; Suman L Mendiratta; Daman Saluja
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.944

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital swabs: comparison of commercial and in house amplification methods with culture.

Authors:  R M Shattock; C Patrizio; P Simmonds; S Sutherland
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.519

9.  A multiplexed microfluidic PCR assay for sensitive and specific point-of-care detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  Deborah Dean; Rosemary S Turingan; Hans-Ulrich Thomann; Anna Zolotova; James Rothschild; Sandeep J Joseph; Timothy D Read; Eugene Tan; Richard F Selden
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Chlamydia trachomatis diversity viewed as a tissue-specific coevolutionary arms race.

Authors:  Alexandra Nunes; Paulo J Nogueira; Maria J Borrego; João P Gomes
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 13.583

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.