Literature DB >> 8024501

Accuracy of stereolithographic models of human anatomy.

T M Barker1, W J Earwaker, D A Lisle.   

Abstract

A study was undertaken to determine the dimensional accuracy of anatomical replicas derived from X-ray 3D computed tomography (CT) images and produced using the rapid prototyping technique of stereolithography (SLA). A dry bone skull and geometric phantom were scanned, and replicas were produced. Distance measurements were obtained to compare the original objects and the resulting replicas. Repeated measurements between anatomical landmarks were used for comparison of the original skull and replica. Results for the geometric phantom demonstrate a mean difference of +0.47 mm, representing an accuracy of 97.7-99.12%. Measurements of the skull produced a range of absolute differences (maximum +4.62 mm, minimum +0.1 mm, mean +0.85 mm). These results support the use of SLA models of human anatomical structures in such areas as pre-operative planning of complex surgical procedures. For applications where higher accuracy is required, improvements can be expected by utilizing smaller pixel resolution in the CT images. Stereolithographic models can now be confidently employed as accurate, three-dimensional replicas of complex, anatomical structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8024501     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1994.tb00146.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  24 in total

Review 1.  Rapid prototyping techniques for anatomical modelling in medicine.

Authors:  M McGurk; A A Amis; P Potamianos; N M Goodger
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Revolutionizing restorative dentistry: an overview.

Authors:  D R Prithviraj; Harleen Kaur Bhalla; Richa Vashisht; K Sounderraj; Shruthi Prithvi
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2014-02-05

3.  Accuracy of medical models made by consumer-grade fused deposition modelling printers.

Authors:  Christian Petropolis; Daniel Kozan; Leif Sigurdson
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.947

Review 4.  Measuring and Establishing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of 3D Printed Medical Models.

Authors:  Elizabeth George; Peter Liacouras; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Three dimensional CT reconstruction: a comparison between 2D, 3D CT and original anatomical structures.

Authors:  Eldho Markose; B Vikraman; M Veerabahu
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-06-10

6.  Use of 3-d stereolithographic models in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Pushkar Mehra; Jeremey Miner; Richard D'Innocenzo; Mohammed Nadershah
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-03-04

7.  Laser stereolithography and supercritical fluid processing for custom-designed implant fabrication.

Authors:  V K Popov; A V Evseev; A L Ivanov; V V Roginski; A I Volozhin; S M Howdle
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  An experimental method for stereolithic mandible fabrication and image preparation.

Authors:  Shawn Russett; Paul Major; Jason Carey; Roger Toogood; Pierre Boulanger
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2007-07-17

9.  [Rapid prototyping in planning reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Review and evaluation of indications in clinical use].

Authors:  J S Bill; J F Reuther
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2004-03-16

10.  An MRI-Compatible Hydrodynamic Simulator of Cerebrospinal Fluid Motion in the Cervical Spine.

Authors:  Suraj Thyagaraj; Soroush Heidari Pahlavian; Lucas R Sass; Francis Loth; Morteza Vatani; Jae-Won Choi; R Shane Tubbs; Daniel Giese; Jan-Robert Kroger; Alexander C Bunck; Bryn A Martin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.