Literature DB >> 23139460

Three dimensional CT reconstruction: a comparison between 2D, 3D CT and original anatomical structures.

Eldho Markose1, B Vikraman, M Veerabahu.   

Abstract

Conventional two dimensional computed tomography has provided significant advancement in clinical diagnosis with information on cross-sectional anatomy of various parts of the body. However, three dimensional representations are not directly available. This is now made possible by recent development of CAD software and CT equipments and technique such as multiplanar reformation capable of providing 3D reconstruction using 2D CT data. This article evaluates the accuracy of measurements and dimensions in 3D CT reconstruction.

Keywords:  3D CT; Three-dimensional

Year:  2009        PMID: 23139460      PMCID: PMC3454017          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-009-0002-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  12 in total

1.  Positional changes of the mandibular condyle assessed by three-dimensional computed tomography.

Authors:  D A Tyndall; J B Renner; C Phillips; S R Matteson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls.

Authors:  Gregory L Adams; Stuart A Gansky; Arthur J Miller; William E Harrell; David C Hatcher
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  The use of a new 3D splint and double CT scan procedure to obtain an accurate anatomic virtual augmented model of the skull.

Authors:  G R J Swennen; E-L Barth; C Eulzer; F Schutyser
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Gwen R J Swennen; Filip Schutyser
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part II. Normal values and growth trends.

Authors:  A A Waitzman; J C Posnick; D C Armstrong; G E Pron
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  1992-03

Review 7.  Computed tomography.

Authors:  S L Brooks
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  1993-10

8.  Computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  D E Altobelli; R Kikinis; J B Mulliken; H Cline; W Lorensen; F Jolesz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Accuracy of stereolithographic models of human anatomy.

Authors:  T M Barker; W J Earwaker; D A Lisle
Journal:  Australas Radiol       Date:  1994-05

10.  A method for three-dimensional image reformation for quantitative cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  S R Matteson; W Bechtold; C Phillips; E V Staab
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.895

View more
  3 in total

1.  Application Value of the CT Scan 3D Reconstruction Technique in Maxillofacial Fracture Patients.

Authors:  Jie Kang; Lijie Jiang
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Correlation of radiomorphometric indices of the mandible and mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Aida Karagah; Reza Tabrizi; Fatemeh Pourahmadali; Ahad Alizadeh; Maryam Tofangchiha; Romeo Patini
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-09-07

3.  An Evaluation of Dental Crowding in Relation to the Mesiodistal Crown Widths and Arch Dimensions in Southern Indian Population.

Authors:  Partha Jyoti Das; Winniecia Dkhar; Abhimanyu Pradhan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.