Literature DB >> 2522526

Splitting visual space with attention.

R Nicoletti1, C Umiltá.   

Abstract

If a right-left spatial compatibility effect is observed, it can be maintained that the space has been segmented into right- and left-side parts. The present study aimed at showing a spatial compatibility effect (and, by implication, a right-left subdivision of space) solely attributable to the orienting of attention. Five groups of 8 normal subjects were required to give right-left discriminative responses to stimuli presented within one of six empty boxes arranged in a horizontal row. Reaction times and errors were recorded. The first two experiments showed that a right-left grouping of the boxes occurred regardless of whether subjects' fixation was kept at the intermediate position (Experiment 1) or at one extremity (Experiment 2) of the row. In Experiments 3 and 4, subjects' attention was not aligned with a fixed position but was moved, through peripheral cues, from trial to trial and positioned between different pairs of adjacent boxes. The results showed that the display was again subdivided into two regions and that the reference point for the right-left subdivision was the focus of attention. In Experiment 5, eye position was instrumentally monitored, and subjects' attention was directed by central cues. The results confirmed that the focusing of attention leads to a right-left partitioning of space, with the boundary at the locus of focal attention. In conclusion, we demonstrated, by employing a right-left spatial compatibility paradigm, that directing attention to a position in space brings about a right-left perceptual organization that predominates over that provided by the other egocentric reference axes.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2522526     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.1.164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  29 in total

1.  Influences of response-activating stimuli and passage of time on the Simon effect.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-03-15

2.  Attentional processes link perception and action.

Authors:  Stephen J Anderson; Noriko Yamagishi; Vivian Karavia
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

4.  Experimental disentangling of spatial-compatibility and interhemispheric-relay effects in simple reaction time (Poffenberger paradigm).

Authors:  Claude M J Braun; Caroline Larocque; André Achim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-20       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Logan Pedersen; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-30

6.  Mechanisms underlying spatial coding in a multiple-item Simon task.

Authors:  Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Piotr Jaśkowski; Rolf Verleger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-05-01

7.  Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  T H Stoffer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

8.  Attentionally splitting the mass distribution of hand-held rods.

Authors:  G Burton; M T Turvey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

9.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.

Authors:  C H Lu; R W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-06

10.  Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.