Literature DB >> 8008779

Hand-hemispace spatial compatibility, precueing, and stimulus-onset asynchrony.

J L Bradshaw1, C J Willmott, C Umiltà, J G Phillips, J A Bradshaw, J B Mattingley.   

Abstract

The role of attention and the resolution of coding conflicts in hand-hemispace spatial-compatibility effects was examined in a precueing experiment in which visual and vibrotactile precues, with various stimulus-onset asynchronies (SOAs), were presented in blocked and random order. It was expected that precues at the shorter SOAs would fail to facilitate the shifting of attention, as they occur too close to the imperative stimulus to be informative. The task would therefore approximate one of choice reaction time (RT), resulting in a hand-hemispace spatial-compatibility effect. Conversely, the longer SOAs would provide the subject with sufficient time in which to shift attention fully, and would therefore result in a task more like that of simple reaction time (SRT). It was expected that the hand-hemispace spatial-compatibility effect would then be absent. As was expected, this effect was present at the shorter SOAs, and absent at the longer SOAs. In Experiments 2 and 3, provision of a visual precue further facilitated attentional deployment, as did blocking the presentation of various SOAs in Experiment 3. Vibrotactile and visual precues did not differ in their ability to direct attention, implying that these modalities orient attention and precue location in essentially similar ways. These findings are discussed within the context of the mechanisms though to underlie the time course of spatial compatibility and the dissipation of a fading trace of interfering spatial codes.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8008779     DOI: 10.1007/BF00419704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  17 in total

1.  Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  T H Stoffer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1991

2.  Direction of gaze during vibrotactile choice reaction time tasks.

Authors:  J M Pierson; J L Bradshaw; T F Meyer; M J Howard; J A Bradshaw
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination.

Authors:  M Cheal; D R Lyon
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-11

4.  Negative priming between response modalities: evidence for the central locus of inhibition in selective attention.

Authors:  S P Tipper; G M MacQueen; J C Brehaut
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-01

5.  Overt and covert attention and vibrotactile reaction times: gaze direction, spatial compatibility and hemispatial asymmetry.

Authors:  J L Bradshaw; J A Bradshaw; J M Pierson-Savage; N C Nettleton
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1988-03

6.  Mapping of extracorporeal space by vibrotactile reaction times: a far-left-side disadvantage.

Authors:  J M Pierson-Savage; J L Bradshaw
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code.

Authors:  R J Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-06

8.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis.

Authors:  M Annett
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1970-08

9.  The functional role of attention for spatial coding in the Simon effect.

Authors:  T H Stoffer; A R Yakin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1994

10.  Compatibility due to the coding of the relative position of the effectors.

Authors:  R Nicoletti; C Umiltà; E Ladavas
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1984-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  S-R compatibility effects due to context-dependent spatial stimulus coding.

Authors:  B Hommel; Y Lippa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-09

2.  The Roles of Attentional Shifts and Attentional Reengagement in Resolving The Spatial Compatibility Effect in Tactile Simon-like Tasks.

Authors:  Wanting Zheng; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.