Literature DB >> 8005433

Epistasis analysis of suppressor mutations that allow HO expression in the absence of the yeast SW15 transcriptional activator.

D J Stillman1, S Dorland, Y Yu.   

Abstract

We have examined mutations which overcome the requirement for SW15-dependent transcriptional activation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO gene. We show that the RPD3 gene is the same as SDI2, and that SIN4 is the same as the TSF3 and SDI3 genes. We have also identified a new swi5 suppressor, RGR1. The RGR1 gene was identified originally as a negative regulator of SUC2. Epistasis analysis indicates that six swi5 suppressor genes function in four distinct pathways, with RPD3 and SIN3 in one pathway, RGR1 and SIN4 in a second pathway, and SDI4 and SIN5 each in distinct pathways. Finally, we show that complete suppression of the swi5 defect in HO expression by sin5 requires the wild-type ACE2 gene. This suggests that one function of SIN5 is to prevent ACE2, a SWI5 homolog, from activating HO expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8005433      PMCID: PMC1205884     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  25 in total

1.  Stable nucleosome positioning and complete repression by the yeast alpha 2 repressor are disrupted by amino-terminal mutations in histone H4.

Authors:  S Y Roth; M Shimizu; L Johnson; M Grunstein; R T Simpson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  In vitro regulation of a SIN3-dependent DNA-binding activity by stimulatory and inhibitory factors.

Authors:  H Wang; D J Stillman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Synthetic enhancement in gene interaction: a genetic tool come of age.

Authors:  L Guarente
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Regulation of yeast mating-type interconversion: feedback control of HO gene expression by the mating-type locus.

Authors:  R Jensen; G F Sprague; I Herskowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Characterization of the yeast SWI1, SWI2, and SWI3 genes, which encode a global activator of transcription.

Authors:  C L Peterson; I Herskowitz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1992-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Mutational and functional analysis of dominant SPT2 (SIN1) suppressor alleles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  L Lefebvre; M Smith
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Involvement of the SIN4 global transcriptional regulator in the chromatin structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Y W Jiang; D J Stillman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Bipartite structure of an early meiotic upstream activation sequence from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K S Bowdish; A P Mitchell
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein.

Authors:  H Wang; D J Stillman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  TSF3, a global regulatory protein that silences transcription of yeast GAL genes, also mediates repression by alpha 2 repressor and is identical to SIN4.

Authors:  S Chen; R W West; S L Johnson; H Gans; B Kruger; J Ma
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.272

View more
  41 in total

1.  Cell cycle-regulated histone acetylation required for expression of the yeast HO gene.

Authors:  J E Krebs; M H Kuo; C D Allis; C L Peterson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Roles for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SDS3, CBK1 and HYM1 genes in transcriptional repression by SIN3.

Authors:  S Dorland; M L Deegenaars; D J Stillman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A Role for Mediator Core in Limiting Coactivator Recruitment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Robert M Yarrington; Yaxin Yu; Chao Yan; Lu Bai; David J Stillman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Role for ADA/GCN5 products in antagonizing chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression.

Authors:  K J Pollard; C L Peterson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Role of negative regulation in promoter specificity of the homologous transcriptional activators Ace2p and Swi5p.

Authors:  P R Dohrmann; W P Voth; D J Stillman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Transcriptional repression by the SMRT-mSin3 corepressor: multiple interactions, multiple mechanisms, and a potential role for TFIIB.

Authors:  C W Wong; M L Privalsky
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Mad proteins contain a dominant transcription repression domain.

Authors:  D E Ayer; C D Laherty; Q A Lawrence; A P Armstrong; R N Eisenman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Chromatin-associated genes protect the yeast genome from Ty1 insertional mutagenesis.

Authors:  Katherine M Nyswaner; Mary Ann Checkley; Ming Yi; Robert M Stephens; David J Garfinkel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Mediator subunits and histone methyltransferase Set2 contribute to Ino2-dependent transcriptional activation of phospholipid biosynthesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Anne Dettmann; Yvonne Jäschke; Ivonne Triebel; Jessica Bogs; Ireen Schröder; Hans-Joachim Schüller
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.291

10.  From gene networks to gene function.

Authors:  Thomas Schlitt; Kimmo Palin; Johan Rung; Sabine Dietmann; Michael Lappe; Esko Ukkonen; Alvis Brazma
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.