Literature DB >> 8816491

Mad proteins contain a dominant transcription repression domain.

D E Ayer1, C D Laherty, Q A Lawrence, A P Armstrong, R N Eisenman.   

Abstract

Transcription repression by the basic region-helix-loop-helix-zipper (bHLHZip) protein Mad1 requires DNA binding as a ternary complex with Max and mSin3A or mSin3B, the mammalian orthologs of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptional corepressor SIN3. The interaction between Mad1 and mSin3 is mediated by three potential amphipathic alpha-helices: one in the N terminus of Mad (mSin interaction domain, or SID) and two within the second paired amphipathic helix domain (PAH2) of mSin3A. Mutations that alter the structure of the SID inhibit in vitro interaction between Mad and mSin3 and inactivate Mad's transcriptional repression activity. Here we show that a 35-residue region containing the SID represents a dominant repression domain whose activity can be transferred to a heterologous DNA binding region. A fusion protein comprising the Mad1 SID linked to a Ga14 DNA binding domain mediates repression of minimal as well as complex promoters dependent on Ga14 DNA binding sites. In addition, the SID represses the transcriptional activity of linked VP16 and c-Myc transactivation domains. When fused to a full-length c-Myc protein, the Mad1 SID specifically represses both c-Myc's transcriptional and transforming activities. Fusions between the GAL DNA binding domain and full-length mSin3 were also capable of repression. We show that the association between Mad1 and mSin3 is not only dependent on the helical SID but is also dependent on both putative helices of the mSin3 PAH2 region, suggesting that stable interaction requires all three helices. Our results indicate that the SID is necessary and sufficient for transcriptional repression mediated by the Mad protein family and that SID repression is dominant over several distinct transcriptional activators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8816491      PMCID: PMC231578          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.16.10.5772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  76 in total

1.  An embryonically expressed gene is a target for c-Myc regulation via the c-Myc-binding sequence.

Authors:  N Benvenisty; A Leder; A Kuo; P Leder
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  A switch from Myc:Max to Mad:Max heterocomplexes accompanies monocyte/macrophage differentiation.

Authors:  D E Ayer; R N Eisenman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Repression of cyclin D1: a novel function of MYC.

Authors:  A Philipp; A Schneider; I Väsrik; K Finke; Y Xiong; D Beach; K Alitalo; M Eilers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Mammalian Ras interacts directly with the serine/threonine kinase Raf.

Authors:  A B Vojtek; S M Hollenberg; J A Cooper
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-07-16       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Transcriptional repression by the human bZIP factor E4BP4: definition of a minimal repression domain.

Authors:  I G Cowell; H C Hurst
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-01-11       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  An E-box element localized in the first intron mediates regulation of the prothymosin alpha gene by c-myc.

Authors:  S Gaubatz; A Meichle; M Eilers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  A multisubunit complex associated with the RNA polymerase II CTD and TATA-binding protein in yeast.

Authors:  C M Thompson; A J Koleske; D M Chao; R A Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-07-02       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The ornithine decarboxylase gene is a transcriptional target of c-Myc.

Authors:  C Bello-Fernandez; G Packham; J L Cleveland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Expression of mad, mxi1, max and c-myc during induced differentiation of hematopoietic cells: opposite regulation of mad and c-myc.

Authors:  L G Larsson; M Pettersson; F Oberg; K Nilsson; B Lüscher
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  An RNA polymerase II holoenzyme responsive to activators.

Authors:  A J Koleske; R A Young
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  68 in total

1.  Functional analysis of the SIN3-histone deacetylase RPD3-RbAp48-histone H4 connection in the Xenopus oocyte.

Authors:  D Vermaak; P A Wade; P L Jones; Y B Shi; A P Wolffe
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Transcriptional repression by the insulator protein CTCF involves histone deacetylases.

Authors:  M Lutz; L J Burke; G Barreto; F Goeman; H Greb; R Arnold; H Schultheiss; A Brehm; T Kouzarides; V Lobanenkov; R Renkawitz
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Set9, a novel histone H3 methyltransferase that facilitates transcription by precluding histone tail modifications required for heterochromatin formation.

Authors:  Kenichi Nishioka; Sergei Chuikov; Kavitha Sarma; Hediye Erdjument-Bromage; C David Allis; Paul Tempst; Danny Reinberg
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Regulation of cyclin D2 gene expression by the Myc/Max/Mad network: Myc-dependent TRRAP recruitment and histone acetylation at the cyclin D2 promoter.

Authors:  C Bouchard; O Dittrich; A Kiermaier; K Dohmann; A Menkel; M Eilers; B Lüscher
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  S-phase-specific expression of the Mad3 gene in proliferating and differentiating cells.

Authors:  E J Fox; S C Wright
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2001-10-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Dimeric RFX proteins contribute to the activity and lineage specificity of the interleukin-5 receptor alpha promoter through activation and repression domains.

Authors:  A Iwama; J Pan; P Zhang; W Reith; B Mach; D G Tenen; Z Sun
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Repression by Ikaros and Aiolos is mediated through histone deacetylase complexes.

Authors:  J Koipally; A Renold; J Kim; K Georgopoulos
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Histone sumoylation is associated with transcriptional repression.

Authors:  Yuzuru Shiio; Robert N Eisenman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The highly conserved region of the co-repressor Sin3A functionally interacts with the co-repressor Alien.

Authors:  Udo Moehren; Uwe Dressel; Christina A Reeb; Sami Väisänen; Thomas W Dunlop; Carsten Carlberg; Aria Baniahmad
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Functional analysis of the Mad1-mSin3A repressor-corepressor interaction reveals determinants of specificity, affinity, and transcriptional response.

Authors:  Shaun M Cowley; Richard S Kang; John V Frangioni; Jason J Yada; Alec M DeGrand; Ishwar Radhakrishnan; Robert N Eisenman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.