Literature DB >> 8003979

DNA binding and bending by the transcription factors GAL4(62*) and GAL4(149*).

K K Rodgers1, J E Coleman.   

Abstract

The DNA binding domain of the GAL4 transcription factor from yeast is located in the N-terminal 60 residues of the polypeptide of 881 amino acids. This domain binds 2 Zn ions, which form a binuclear cluster, Zn2C6, with 6 C residues, two of which bridge the 2 metal ions (Gardner KH et al., 1991, Biochemistry 30:11292-11302). Binding of Zn or Cd to GAL4 induces the conformation of the protein necessary to recognize the specific DNA sequence, UASG, to which GAL4 binds as a dimer. Gel retardation assays have been utilized to determine the relative affinities of the Zn2 and Zn1 forms of the N-terminal 149 residues of GAL4, GAL4(149*), for UASG DNA sequences. We show that Cd2- and Zn1GAL4(149*) bind to UASG DNA with 2-fold and 4-8-fold lower affinities than Zn2GAL4(149*), respectively. Thus, the metal species and the number of metal ions bound have measurable effects on the specific DNA binding affinity of GAL4, but these differences are small in comparison to the ratio, > 10(3) under some conditions, that characterizes the specific to nonspecific DNA binding affinities of the N-terminal fragments of GAL4. A shorter N-terminal fragment, GAL4(62*), although it continues to recognize the UASG sequence with a high degree of specificity, binds with 1,000-2,000-fold lower affinity than does Zn2GAL4(149*). Gel retardation titrations of a DNA containing 2 UASG sites with increasing concentrations of GAL4(62*) generate a series of 4 retarded bands in contrast to 2 retarded bands formed when the same DNA is titrated with GAL4(149*). These data suggest that GAL4(62*) binds to the UASG sites as individual monomers that dimerize on the DNA, whereas GAL4(149*) binds the UASG DNA cooperatively as a dimer. The approximately 10(3) lower affinity of GAL4(62*) for the UASG DNA can be accounted for by its failure to form dimers in solution. Zn2-, Zn1-, or Cd2GAL4(149*) induces differential rates of gel migration in a series of circularly permutated UASG-containing DNA restriction fragments. Analysis of the data suggests that all 3 proteins cause a 26 degrees angle of bend in the DNA when bound to 1 UASG site and 45 degrees when bound to 2 tandem UASG sites. The same assay shows that GAL4(62*) does not induce significant bending of the UASG DNA sequences. Thus, the additional subdomains found in the larger polypeptide fragment, GAL4(149*), must exert an additional force on the DNA either through direct contacts with the DNA or indirectly through altered protein conformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8003979      PMCID: PMC2142858          DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560030409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  24 in total

Review 1.  Zinc proteins: enzymes, storage proteins, transcription factors, and replication proteins.

Authors:  J E Coleman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Deletion analysis of GAL4 defines two transcriptional activating segments.

Authors:  J Ma; M Ptashne
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-03-13       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Interaction of positive and negative regulatory proteins in the galactose regulon of yeast.

Authors:  S A Johnston; J M Salmeron; S S Dincher
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-07-03       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  DNA bending at adenine . thymine tracts.

Authors:  H S Koo; H M Wu; D M Crothers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Apr 10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Wild type GAL4 binds cooperatively to the GAL1-10 UASG in vitro.

Authors:  T Kang; T Martins; I Sadowski
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1993-05-05       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Equilibria and kinetics of lac repressor-operator interactions by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  M Fried; D M Crothers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1981-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The locus of sequence-directed and protein-induced DNA bending.

Authors:  H M Wu; D M Crothers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Apr 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Solution structure of the DNA-binding domain of Cd2-GAL4 from S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  J D Baleja; R Marmorstein; S C Harrison; G Wagner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Effects of DNA binding and metal substitution on the dynamics of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain as studied by amide proton exchange.

Authors:  T Mau; J D Baleja; G Wagner
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Repetitive zinc-binding domains in the protein transcription factor IIIA from Xenopus oocytes.

Authors:  J Miller; A D McLachlan; A Klug
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  5 in total

1.  Position-dependent transcriptional regulation of the murine dihydrofolate reductase promoter by the E2F transactivation domain.

Authors:  C J Fry; J E Slansky; P J Farnham
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Coordination dynamics of biological zinc "clusters" in metallothioneins and in the DNA-binding domain of the transcription factor Gal4.

Authors:  W Maret; K S Larsen; B L Vallee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Delivery of intact transcription factor by using self-assembled supramolecular nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Hao Wang; Ken-ichiro Kamei; Ming Yan; Kuan-Ju Chen; Qinghua Yuan; Linqi Shi; Yunfeng Lu; Hsian-Rong Tseng
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  UME6, a negative regulator of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, contains a C-terminal Zn2Cys6 binuclear cluster that binds the URS1 DNA sequence in a zinc-dependent manner.

Authors:  S F Anderson; C M Steber; R E Esposito; J E Coleman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  HeteroTOCSY-based experiments for measuring heteronuclear relaxation in nucleic acids and proteins.

Authors:  B I Schweitzer; K H Gardner; G Tucker-Kellogg
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.835

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.