Literature DB >> 20457879

Some consequences of demographic stochasticity in population genetics.

Todd L Parsons1, Christopher Quince, Joshua B Plotkin.   

Abstract

Much of population genetics is based on the diffusion limit of the Wright-Fisher model, which assumes a fixed population size. This assumption is violated in most natural populations, particularly for microbes. Here we study a more realistic model that decouples birth and death events and allows for a stochastically varying population size. Under this model, classical quantities such as the probability of and time before fixation of a mutant allele can differ dramatically from their Wright-Fisher expectations. Moreover, inferences about natural selection based on Wright-Fisher assumptions can yield erroneous and even contradictory conclusions: at small population densities one allele will appear superior, whereas at large densities the other allele will dominate. Consequently, competition assays in laboratory conditions may not reflect the outcome of long-term evolution in the field. These results highlight the importance of incorporating demographic stochasticity into basic models of population genetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20457879      PMCID: PMC2927761          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.115030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  41 in total

1.  Directional selection and the site-frequency spectrum.

Authors:  C D Bustamante; J Wakeley; S Sawyer; D L Hartl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population.

Authors:  M KIMURA
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1962-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  The limits of theoretical population genetics.

Authors:  John Wakeley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism.

Authors:  F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Nautural selection for within-generation variance in offspring number.

Authors:  J H Gillespie
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Probability of fixation under weak selection: a branching process unifying approach.

Authors:  Amaury Lambert
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 1.570

7.  Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations.

Authors:  Y X Fu; W H Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Sampling theory for neutral alleles in a varying environment.

Authors:  R C Griffiths; S Tavaré
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1994-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Single-nutrient microbial competition: qualitative agreement between experimental and theoretically forecast outcomes.

Authors:  S R Hansen; S P Hubbell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Fitness cost of fluoroquinolone resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium.

Authors:  Etienne Giraud; Axel Cloeckaert; Sylvie Baucheron; Christian Mouline; Elisabeth Chaslus-Dancla
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  19 in total

1.  Population growth enhances the mean fixation time of neutral mutations and the persistence of neutral variation.

Authors:  D Waxman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A unified treatment of the probability of fixation when population size and the strength of selection change over time.

Authors:  D Waxman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The emergence of cooperation from a single mutant during microbial life cycles.

Authors:  Anna Melbinger; Jonas Cremer; Erwin Frey
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Effects of demographic stochasticity and life-history strategies on times and probabilities to fixation.

Authors:  Diala Abu Awad; Camille Coron
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  A mathematical formalism for natural selection with arbitrary spatial and genetic structure.

Authors:  Benjamin Allen; Alex McAvoy
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.259

6.  How Life History Can Sway the Fixation Probability of Mutants.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Li; Shun Kurokawa; Stefano Giaimo; Arne Traulsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Demographic noise can reverse the direction of deterministic selection.

Authors:  George W A Constable; Tim Rogers; Alan J McKane; Corina E Tarnita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Understanding the evolution of interspecies interactions in microbial communities.

Authors:  Florien A Gorter; Michael Manhart; Martin Ackermann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Drift-Induced Selection Between Male and Female Heterogamety.

Authors:  Carl Veller; Pavitra Muralidhar; George W A Constable; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  A universal scaling law determines time reversibility and steady state of substitutions under selection.

Authors:  Michael Manhart; Allan Haldane; Alexandre V Morozov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.